Rules 1 - Judgment Search Results

Ganesh Shukul Alias Nagina Shukla Vs. Tikadhar Shukul and ors. (Heirs ...

Court: Patna

Appeal arises out of the order dated 28.4.1983, passed by the District Judge, East Champaran in T.A. No. 104 of 1982, whereby he refused to condone the delay in filing the appeal and rejected the memo of

In Re: Reference Under Section 113 Read with Order 46, Rule 1, Civil P ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1925Cal906

case at Habiganj, the next friend of a minor decree-bolder was directed to furnish security under order 32, rule 6 (3) of the Civil Procedure Code before receiving certain money on behalf of the minor. Ha filed … conflicting decisions on the point viz., the case of Dwarkanath Dey v. Sailaja Kanta Mullik [1916] 21 C.W.N. 1150 and that of Sarbo Musulmani v. Safar Mandal 1913 Cal. 269, and ha referred the question to this

In Re: Reference Under Rule 1 Order 46, C.P.C.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: 76Ind.Cas.353

1. This is a Reference by the Munsif of Chittagong under Rule 1, Order XLVI, Civil Procedure Code, on … bodies and private employers, the learned Munsif is right in supposing the question depends on the provisions of Rules 2, 3 and 4 of the Civil Procedure Code and on the rules made by the High Court

In the Matter of Amendments to Rules 1 and 10

Court: US Supreme Court

In the Matter of Amendments to Rules 1 and 10 - 108 U.S. 1 (1882) U.S. Supreme Court In the Matter of Amendments to Rules 1 … Rules 1 and 10 - 108 U.S. 1 (1882) U.S. Supreme Court In the Matter of Amendments to Rules 1 and 10, 108 U.S. 1 (1882) In the Matter of Amendments to Rules 1 and 10 November 26,