Rule 12 A - Judgment Search Results

Dr. Mrs. Sukhada W/O Dilip Mulay Vs. the State of Maharashtra, Through ...

Court: Mumbai Aurangabad

authorize any officer in that behalf to examine the record, register, documents and seize and seal the same. Rule 12 of the Rules of 1996 also authorizes an Appropriate Authority or the Officer authorized in this behalf to … and Section 30 – Preconception and Pre-natal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex Selection) Rules 1996 – Rule 11, Rule 12 and Rule 19 – Petitioner filed writ petition praying for quashing and setting aside the impugned order suspending

Parmeshwar and Another Vs. the State of Maharashtra Through Its Secret ...

Court: Mumbai Aurangabad

preventing entry of respondent No.5 and his supporting members. On behalf of respondent No.5 it is contended that Rule 12 of the Bombay Village Panchayat (Sarpanch and Up-Sarpanch) Election Rules 1964 gave ample power to the Additional Collector … group of village panchayat for smaller villages must be fair, socially equitable and just. In my opinion, the Rule 12 can meet the contingency arising for any reason other than the lack of quorum and subsequent adjournment of

Gurpreet Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2007(4)ALD105(SC); 2007(5)ALLMR(SC)475; (SCSuppl)2007(2)CHN40; 2007(3)CTC170; 2008(1)KLJ463; 2006(10)SCALE393; (2006)8SCC457

or upon their joint receipt. Under Sub-Rule (2) it is made clear that nothing in that Rule or Rule 12 shall affect the powers conferred by Section 57 of the Transfer of Property Act.15. A Full Bench of … is legally recoverable, the court may order payment of interest to the mortgagee as provided in that Rule. Rule 12 deals with sale of property subject to prior mortgage and provides for payment out of the said proceeds

Beena Tiwari and anr. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1988SC488; JT1987(4)SC686; 1988LabIC954; 1987(2)SCALE1371; 1988Supp(1)SCC213; [1988]2SCR492

adverse remarks against him which were directed to be communicated to him. Ultimately, his services were terminated under Rule 12 of the Rules. Aggrieved by the order of termination, the respondent filed a writ petition in the High … the State Government and pursuant to such recommendation, the State Government terminated the services of the appellants under Rule 12 of the Rules. Being aggrieved by the orders of termination of their services, the appellants filed writ petitions

Govt. of Nct of Delhi and ors. Vs. K.R. JaIn and ors.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 2006(88)DRJ439

as if the employee had not retired or dismissed, then to which company, he would have been transferred. Rule 12(1) provides (1) If any doubt dispute, difference or issue shall arise in regard to the transfers under these … government thereon, shall be final and binding on all parties. The government in exercise of its power under Rule 12(1) give decision vide letter dated 21.1.04. The letter dated 21.1.04 reads as under:GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI(DEPARTMENT OF

Ashok Kumar Sethi Vs. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Chennai

Court: Chennai

liability. Application in terms of Section 132B is thereafter. Further, it was submitted that under the Income Tax Rule 112, Sub Rule 12(iii) provides the Commissioner of Income Tax to deposit the seized cash into the Personal

Board of Management of Sri Veerbhadreshwar Educational Society, Humnab ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR1999KAR3009; 1999(5)KarLJ129

As indicated there is no dispute about the position that the Karnataka Private Educational Institutions (Discipline and Control) Rules, 1978 (referred to as 'the Rules of 1978') framed by the Government of Karnataka in exercise of power … false entries in the name of the management. (e) On 14-10-1985 you have debited an amount of Rs. 12,500-00 in the name of Shri B.S. Shirol on account of hand loan and this debit has been made

Chickkathimmaiah Vs. Deputy Commissioner, Kolar and Others

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR1999KAR3154; 1999(6)KarLJ615

complete bar against alienation of granted land for the period specified in Rules of 1968 and 1969 applicable. Rule 12 of Land Grant Rules of 1968 as well as Rule 9(1) of Rules of 1969 as operative in … effect of Rule 29-A of 1974 (Amendment) is not to repeal nor to make ineffective the rules like Rule 12 of 1968 or Rule 9(1) of 1969 Rules which provide that the alienation of granted land in favour

Nand Rani Vs. Civil Judge, Junior Division and ors.

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: AIR2004All307

Section 50, Civil Procedure Code and Order 22, Rule 5, Civil Procedure Code would be applicable. Order 22, Rule 12 provides that Rules 3, 4 and 8 of Order 22 will not apply to execution proceedings. However, that … In Bhagwan Das v. Jugal Kishore, AIR 1920 Allahabad 171 the Division Bench interpreted these provisions and held :'Rule 12 distinctly shows that this rule shall not apply to execution proceedings i.e. that it is not compulsory upon

Saroj Srivastava Vs. Rajya Sabha Secretariat

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 1997VIAD(Delhi)245; 70(1997)DLT424; 1997(43)DRJ350

Usha Mehra, J. (1) RULE. (2) Since a short point is involved in this writ petitioner hence it was taken up for disposal. … no application of mind. Why I say there was non-application of mind because in the impugned order dated 12th July, 1995 which is reproduced as under, the Disciplinary Authority has nowhere stated that he has disagreed with