Rooks - Judgment Search Results
Rook Vs. Rice
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-01-1986
ROOK v. RICE - 478 U.S. 1040 (1986) U.S. Supreme Court ROOK v. RICE , 478 U.S. 1040 (1986)
indra Nath Banerjee Vs. Rooke
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Aug-02-1909
Reported in: (1910)ILR37Cal81
the 3rd June 1899, the defendant No. 1 instituted a suit for partition against the present plaintiff, Mr. Rooke, which suit was terminated by a compromise and withdrawn on the 8th June 1899, each party paying his
Mary Geraldine Rooke Vs. John William Rooke
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Feb-23-1934
Reported in: AIR1934Bom230; (1934)36BOMLR492; 150Ind.Cas.1136
John Beaumont, Kt., C.J.1. This is a reference Under Section 17 of the Indian Divorce Act to confirm a decree nisi for dissolution of marriage pronounced at the instance of the wife. In cases under the...
18-section briefs on any result in this list
E.J. Rooke Vs. Bengal Coal Company, Ld.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jan-04-1901
Reported in: (1901)ILR28Cal485
1. The only question which arises in this appeal is, whether the Revenue Court had jurisdiction to entertain the suit that was brought for recovery of rent under Act X of 1859.2. The lease, with which...
Rookes (A.P.) Vs. Barnard and Others
Court: House of Lords
Decided on: Jan-21-1964
which resolved unanimously: We, the members of the A.E.S.D., inform B.O.A.C. that if the Non-Unionist Mr. D. E. Rookes is not removed from the Design Office by 4 p.m., Friday, 13th January, 1956, a withdrawal of labour
National Insurance Co Ltd vs.pamela Rooks and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-30-2017
MAC. APPEAL No.1194/2012 & CM90212014 NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate. versus PAMELA ROOKS AND ORS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA Through: Mr. Navneet Goyal, Advocate for respondent No.1. .….Respondents JUDGMENT (ORAL)
indra Nath Banerji Vs. E.G. Rooke
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Aug-02-1909
Reported in: 3Ind.Cas.316
the 3rd June 1899, the defendant No. 1 instituted a suit for partition against the present plaintiff Mr. Rooke which suit was terminated by a compromise and withdrawn on the 8th June 1899, each party-paying his own
Mr.Gokul C.S., Proprietor, Rooks Elevators, Vs. the State of Kerala
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Oct-09-2014
THURSDAY, THE9H DAY OF OCTOBER201417TH ASWINA, 1936 WP(C).No. 25588 of 2014 (W) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S): -------------------------- MR.GOKUL C.S., PROPRIETOR, ROOKS ELEVATORS, CHANKOOR HOUSE, MUTTAM P.O., HARIPPAD ALLAPPEY - 690 511. BY ADV. SMT.K.LATHA RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------- 1. THE STATE
P.G. Ajayakumar vs P.G.Rennin Rooks
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Mar-03-2022
PRUTHIYEZHATHU HOUSE, ELAMKUNNAPUZHA VILLAGE, KOCHI TALUK, ERNAKULAM, PIN-682503. BY ADVS. A.BALAGOPALAN A.RAJAGOPALAN M.N.MANMADAN M.S.IMTHIYAZ AHAMMED RESPONDENT/S: 1 P.G.RENNIN ROOKS AGED 47 YEARS S/O GANGADHRAN, PRUTHIYEZHATHU HOUSE, ELAMKUNNAPUZHA VILLAGE, KOCHI TALUK, ERNAKULAM, PIN-682503. 2 P G KASTHOORBA W/O
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free