Roll - Judgment Search Results

Jindal Rolling Mills Ltd.Vs. Shree Ganesh Rolling Mills and Others

Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has been filed by the petitioner M/s Jindal Rolling Mills Limited against respondent No. 1 Shree Ganesh Rolling Mills and respondent No. 3 M/s Shree Ganesh Rolling

Devidayal Rolling Mills Vs. Engineering Workers Union and Ors.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2008(3)ALLMR344; 2008(2)BomCR9; (2008)110BOMLR317; [2008(119)FLR129]; (2009)ILLJ36Bom; 2008(4)MhLj607

and undisputed facts leading to these petitions are that the company was employing about 41 workmen on its rolls and there was a settlement signed between the parties from time to time and last such settlement was

Sree Aravindh Steel (P.) Ltd. Vs. Trichy Steel Rolling Mills Ltd.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: [1992]73CompCas607(Mad); (1998)1CompLJ451(Mad)

read with sections 434(1)(a) and 439(b) of the Companies Act (1 of 1956), directing the respondent. Trichy Steel Rolling Mills Limited (in short 'TSRM'), to be wound up under the provisions of the Act and to appoint

M/S. Adarsh Steel Rolling Mills Vs. M/S. R.J. Steel Rolling Mills

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (2001)(136)ELT690TriDel

1. Shri R. Santhanam, Advocate submits that the appellants have prayed for staying the operation of the order. In the impugned order no demand has been made as such although there are some observations by the...

Khodlyaar Rolling Mills Vs. Paschim Gujarat Vij Company Ltd.

Court: Supreme Court of India

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No(s). 11227 OF2018(Arising out of SLP(C)No.1491 of 2015) KHODIYAAR ROLLING MILLS Appellant(s) VERSUS PASCHIM GUJARAT VIJ COMPANY LTD. Respondent(s) JUDGMENT BANUMATHI, J.: (1) Leave granted. (2) This appeal

Elphinstone Metal Rolling Mills Vs. Collector of Central Excise, Bomba ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2004SC3515; 2004(94)ECC197; 2004(167)ELT481(SC); 2004(5)SCALE668; (2004)5SCC548

S. Rajendra Babu, C.J. 1. The appellant is engaged in the manufacture of (i) Copper Sheets and Circles falling under Tariff Item No.26A (2) out of Copper Scrap and Copper Wire Bars, (ii) Copper Wire Bars,...

Poona Rolling Mills Vs. Collector of Central Excise, Pune

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2003LC806(SC); 2003(158)ELT558(SC)

ORDER1. The appellant is engaged in manufacture of M.S. Round Bars by using old and re-rollable cut pieces of bars, plates, angles, etc., purchased from the open market or directly from the manufacturers or from ship...

Vivek Re-rolling Mills Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2002(146)ELT496(SC)

ORDER1. Four of the appellants before the Customs, Excise & Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal (CEGAT) challenged the common Final Order Nos. E/347 to 350/94 of the CEGAT, dated July 21, 1994, in these appeals.2. The appellants...

Peekay Re-rolling Mills (P) Ltd. Vs. the Assistant Commissioner and an ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2007(2)KLT704(SC); 2007(5)SCALE96; (2007)4SCC30; 2009[13]STR305; 2007(1)LC455(SC); 2007AIRSCW3355; JT2007(4)SC589; [2007] 4 SCR 185

Ashok Bhan, J.1. Civil Appeal Nos. 2653 and 2654 of 2006 are directed against the impugned final judgment dated 7.4.2006 of Kerala High Court at Ernakulam in Writ Appeal No. 434 of 2000 and Writ Appeal...

Jay Mahakali Rolling Mills Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2007(215)ELT11(SC); JT2007(9)SC629; 2007(9)SCALE603; [2007]10STT234

1.8.1983 on the final product falling under Tariff Item No.25(9)(ii). Allegation was that the appellant M/s Jay Mahakali Rolling Mills had contravened the provisions of Rule 174 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 (in short the 'Rules')