Roll - Judgment Search Results

Jindal Rolling Mills Ltd.Vs. Shree Ganesh Rolling Mills and Others

Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

the Act) has been filed by the petitioner M/s Jindal Rolling Mills Limited against respondent No. 1 Shree Ganesh Rolling Mills

Devidayal Rolling Mills Vs. Engineering Workers Union and Ors.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2008(3)ALLMR344; 2008(2)BomCR9; (2008)110BOMLR317; [2008(119)FLR129]; (2009)ILLJ36Bom; 2008(4)MhLj607

that the company was employing about 41 workmen on its rolls and there was a settlement signed between the parties from

Sree Aravindh Steel (P.) Ltd. Vs. Trichy Steel Rolling Mills Ltd.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: [1992]73CompCas607(Mad); (1998)1CompLJ451(Mad)

Companies Act (1 of 1956), directing the respondent. Trichy Steel Rolling Mills Limited (in short 'TSRM'), to be wound up under

Rolls Royce India Ltd. Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Reported in: (1988)25ITD136(Delhi)

in each Year of Account RR India will submit to Rolls-Royce a statement showing the Actual Operating Costs incurred up to

Sentinel Rolling Shutters and Engineering Company (Pvt.) Ltd. Vs. the ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1978SC1747; (1978)4SCC260; [1979]1SCR644; [1978]42STC409(SC); 1978(10)LC766(SC)

fitted into position and fixed on the premises that a rolling shutter comes into being as a commercial article and, therefore,

Sharma Metal Rolling Mills and ors.

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: (2000)4GLR2815

of clause (ee) in so far as it relates to rolling and re-rolling must be struck down being discriminatory and violative

Rolls Royce Plc Vs. Dy Director of Income Tax

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

and maintenance support. -To monitor RFQs issued by MOD including Rolls Royce acknowledgement date, quotation date and firm order date. -To

Rolls Royce Plc Vs. Dy. Director of Income-tax

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Reported in: (2008)113TTJ(Delhi)446

The support services requested by Rolls-Royce International and performed by Rolls-Royce India can include but are not limited to: Arranging visits

Cleveland Rolling Mills Vs. Rhodes

Court: US Supreme Court

"6,000 tons Cleveland mine." "5,000 tons Norway mine." "1,500 tons Rolling Mill mine." "1,500 tons Stephenson mine." "And whereas Rhodes &

Vanguard Rolling Shutters and Steel Works Vs. the Commissioner of Sale ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1977SC1505; (1977)2SCC250; [1977]3SCR165; [1977]39STC372(SC); 1977(9)LC271(SC)

the owner First the different parts and components of the rolling shutters are fabricated. It is only when the various component