Roadway - Judgment Search Results

J.C. Roadways Vs. Pandiyan Roadways Corporation Ltd. and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1978SC423; (1977)3SCC558

1. This appeal raises a short point as to whether executive instructions can be issued under Section 43-A of the Motor Vehicles (Madras Amendment) Act 1948 in determining who should be awarded a permit for running...

Ravi Roadways Vs. Asia Bi and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1970SC1241; (1970)2SCC259

route Namakkal to Pandamangalam agreed to transfer for Rs. 40,000/- the permit and the vehicle to M/s. Ravi Roadways - hereinafter called 'Roadways'. Rs. 27,500/- out of the consideration were paid by the Roadways on the date

Srinivasa Roadways Vs. Saroja and ors.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1974)2MLJ364

bus MDU 6991 belonging to the Kodaikanal Motor Union (Private) Limited, and lorry MDA 1440 belonging to Srinivasa Roadways Limited. A number of persons were inside the bus as passengers at the time of the collision and

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Southern Roadways Ltd.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (2003)181CTR(Mad)340; [2004]265ITR404(Mad)

K. Raviraja padian, J. The question referred to at the instance of the Revenue is : '1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal is correct in law in holding...

The General Manager Punjab Roadways Chandigarh Vs. President/General S ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.19528 of 2010 Date of Decision:10. 01.2013 The General Manager, Punjab Roadways, Chandigarh and another ....Petitioners Versus President/General Secretary, Punjab Roadways, Workers Union and others ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE RAJIV

Pepsu Roadways Transport Corpn. Through Its M.D. and Anr Vs. S.K.Sharm ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

writ petition in 1992 claiming that they were appointed originally in a department of PEPSU described as PEPSU Roadways, between January 1955 and September 1956. It is not in dispute that in the PEPSU Roadways the respondents’

Up Roadways Retired Officials And Officers Association Vs. State Of U. ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.894 OF2020UP ROADWAYS RETIRED OFFICIALS AND OFFICERS ASSOCIATION …. APPELLANT VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & ANR. ...RESPONDENTS WITH C.A. No.896/2020 ,

Patel Roadways Limited Vs. Birla Yamaha Limited

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2000(3)CTC59; JT2000(3)SC618; (2000)125PLR816; 2000(2)SCALE559; (2000)4SCC91; [2000]2SCR665; 2000(2)LC887(SC)

consignments containing 267 generator sets at Ghaziabad in the State of Uttar Pradesh, with the appellant M/s Patel Roadways Limited for transportation. The freight charges were duly paid by the consignor to the carrier and necessary lorry

Jaihind Roadways Vs. Maharashtra Rajya Mathadi Transport and General K ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2006(1)BomCR287; [2006(108)FLR754]; JT2005(12)SC57; 2005(8)SCALE1; (2005)8SCC51; 2006(2)SLJ32(SC); 2005(2)LC1409(SC)

Arijit Pasayat, J.1. All these appeals have a common matrix in a judgment rendered by a Division Bench of the Bombay High Court dismissing the appeals filed by the present appellants which were filed against judgments...

Cholan Roadways Limited Vs. G. Thirugnanasambandam

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: I(2005)ACC143; AIR2005SC570; 2005(5)ALLMR(SC)439; [2005(104)FLR440]; [2005(2)JCR196(SC)]; JT2005(1)SC116; (2005)ILLJ569SC; (2005)3SCC241; (2005)1UPLBEC817

S.B. Sinha, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 6.6.2001 passed by a Division Bench of the Madras High Court in W.A. No.46/1993 as also the judgment and order passed by the...