Ringing The Changes - Judgment Search Results

Ring Vs. Arizona

Court: US Supreme Court

Ring v. Arizona - 536 U.S. 584 (2002) OCTOBER TERM, 2001 Syllabus RING v. ARIZONA CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME … their retention of old ones adopted immediately post-Furman-is still the product of that case, and not of a changed social belief that murder simpliciter does not deserve death? Second, and more important, my observing over the past

Ring Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

Ring v. United States - 419 U.S. 18 (1974) U.S. Supreme Court Ring v. United States, 419 U.S. 18

Ring Vs. Maxwell

Court: US Supreme Court

Ring v. Maxwell - 58 U.S. 147 (1854) U.S. Supreme Court Ring v. Maxwell, 58 U.S. 17 How. 147 … section were made distributable by its 26th section; that the 8th section of the act of 1846 only changed the amount of the penalty in the cases it reached; that whereas, by the 17th section of the

Shimoga Piston Rings Private Limited Vs. the State of Karnataka and an ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR2006KAR969; [2006]144STC490(Kar)

the petitioner is that while the Section itself permitted the continuation of the benefit in view of the change over to the VAT system of taxing, it is only the Rules that has disentitled the petitioner to

Ring Gears India Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs, Acc,

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

1. We waive pre-deposit of duty and penalty, stay recovery thereof and proceed to dispose of the appeal itself with consent of both sides.2. Duty demand of Rs. 28,34,707.33 has been confirmed and penalty of Rs....

Mipco Seamless Rings (Guj) Ltd. Vs. the Commissioner of Customs and

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

1. The appeal is directed against the order-in-appeal passed by the Commissioner (Appeals). The brief facts are as follows.2. The appellant succeeded in obtaining a favourable order from the Commissioner (Appeals) inasmuch as, out of the...

Jer Ring Gears Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Reported in: (2005)(186)ELT73Tri(Bang.)

1. This appeal arises from OIA No. 180/2002-C.E., dated 6-4-2002. The department has confirmed demands in terms of Section 11A of the Central Excise Act and imposed penalty of Rs. 5,000/- under Rule 173Q of Central...

i.P. Rings Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs (Air)

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

1. The appellants imported stainless steel wires and filed four Bills of Entry dated 8th, 12th, 14th and 16th March, 2006, The goods were cleared before 27-3-2002 on payment of duty at 40% (BCD) +16% (CVD)...

Shriram Piston Rings Limited Vs. Usha International Limited

Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

erstwhile Usha International Limited had merged into Jay Engineering Works Limited and after the merger the entry was changed to Usha International Limited persuant to an order dated 26/05/2008 by the Honble Delhi High Court in company

Mipco Seamless Rings (Guj.) Ltd. Vs. Collector of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (1998)(102)ELT396Tri(Mum.)bai

no evidence that the audit parties were furnished with their balance sheet showing recovery of design and development changes separately by debit notes.8. The other issue is the confiscation of visually scrap and dimensionally scrap rings valued … 1. The Appellants manufacture excisable goods seamless rings both unmachined and machined. On 5-10-1990 Central Excise Preventive Officers visited Appellants factory and found some rings packed