Right Whale - Judgment Search Results

Tvl.Blue Whale Shipping Company Vs The Assistant Commissioner (ST)

Court: Chennai

09-02-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN and WMP NO. 4763 OF 2026, WMP NO. 4760 OF 2026 Tvl.Blue Whale Shipping Company 1st Floor, House No. 7, New No.15, Dharmaraja Koil Street, Kilpauk Garden, Chennai-600 010 Through its

Whale Stationery Products Ltd. Vs. Kores C.E. Gmbh and anr.

Court: Delhi

his claim on a defence and ‘the facts which must be proved in order to establish the Plaintiff’s right to the relief claimed in the plaint or the Defendant’s defence in the written statement.’ Viewed in that … IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(OS) 328 of 2011 WHALE STATIONERY PRODUCTS LTD. ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Jayant K. Mehta & Mr. Anuj Kapoor, Advocates. versus KORES C.E.

Whale Stationery Products Ltd. and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and a ...

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 2007(2)CTLJ357(Del); 137(2007)DLT516; 2007(94)DRJ164; (2007)146PLR28; [2007]75SCL351(Delhi)

of which the holders of preference shares issued before the commencement of this Act have the same voting rights in all respects as the holders of equity shares, exercises or controls more than half of the total

M/S. Whale Stationery Products Vs. C.C.E., Meerut

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Matched in: Parties M/S. Whale Stationery Products Vs. C.C.E., Meerut

Blue Whale Shipping Co. Vs. Commissioner of Customs (Sea)

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Reported in: (2003)(88)ECC28

also submitted that the Commissioner has noted in the order that Shri P.G.Rameshbabu, Managing Partner of M/s Blue Whale Shipping Company, the appellants herein in his voluntary statement revealed that the CHA had handled two consignments vide

Whale Stationery Products Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (2004)(168)ELT405TriDel

however, was obtained after the impugned order was passed. The appellant-company was using the trademark on their goods right from 1994. The Board of Directors of. the Company had, however, permitted its conditional use by other companies … 1. M/s. Whale Stationery Products Ltd., the appellants in appeal No.E/566/2002, have two manufacturing units at Dehradun, one in UPSIDC Industrial

Japan Whaling Ass'n Vs. Cetacean Soc'y

Court: US Supreme Court

117 Cong.Rec. 34751 (1971) (remarks of Rep. Dingell). Denmark, Germany, and Norway, members of the ICNAF, exercised their right to file timely objections to the quotas, however, and thus were exempt from their limitations. Although respondents are … DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Syllabus The International Convention for the Regulation of Whaling (ICRW) included a Schedule regulating whale harvesting practices of member nations (including the United States and Japan) and setting harvest limits for various whale

Pacific Steam Whaling Co. Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

is said, cannot, by imposing both sets of duties upon the same tribunal, deprive a party of a right which he would have if those duties were entrusted to different officials. If we are justified in giving

Union of India Vs. Whale Graphics (India) Ltd.

Court: Delhi

& FAO2572013 Decided on :19. h November, 2013 UNION OF INDIA Through: ..... Appellant Mr.Anuj Aggarwal, Adv. versus WHALE GRAPHICS (INDIA) LTD. ..... Respondent Through: CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI V.K. SHALI, J.(ORAL) CM No.9255/2013 (Condonation

Kores (India) Limited Vs. Whale Stationery Products Ltd.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (2008)110BOMLR276; 2008(3)MhLj523; LC2008(1)155; 2008(36)PTC463(Bom)

Defendants is that the word mark KORES was conceived of by the Second Defendant who alone has the right, title and ownership over the use of the mark in the international market and the First Defendant is