Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Right To Site - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 20 1912

Dossabhai Bejanji Motivala Vs. the Special Officer, Salsette Building ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Mar-20-1912

Reported in: (1912)ILR36Bom599

of those very executive orders of the Government whose validity is now in dispute. And if I am right in thinking that those orders are of no effect, then it follows that the award is that which … is numbered 12104, and is dated the 22nd December 1906. By that Resolution, the Special Officer, Salsette Building Sites, was directed to take order for the acquisition of the land. This officer was at the time Mr.


Mar 20 1912

Dosabhai Bezanji Motivala Vs. the Special Officer, Salsette Building S ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Mar-20-1912

Reported in: 16Ind.Cas.549

of those very executive orders of the Government whose validity is now in dispute, And, if I am right in thinking that those orders are of no effect, then it follows that the award is that which … is numbered 12104, and is dated the 22nd December 1906. By that Resolution, the Special Officer, Salsette Building Sites, was directed to take order for the acquisition of the land. This Officer was at the time Mr.


Jan 30 2026

Maruthi Megacity Site Owners Welfare Association vs Sri B Moorthy

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Jan-30-2026

to 50, there are 200 other site owners, who are the members of the petitioner - Association, whose rights would also be affected by any order to be passed in the suit and as such, they were


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 14 2025

Tvl. Sign Sites Publicities Vs Deputy State Tax officer II

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Feb-14-2025

14.02.2025CORAMTHE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY and W.M.P.Nos.5443, 5444, 5448, 5451, 5455 & 5456 of 2025 Tvl. Sign Sites Publicities (Represented By Its Proprietor Mohammed Jaffer Abdul Hassan) No.2F, Gee Gee Emerald, 312, Valluvarkottam High Road, Chennai


Jul 01 2024

The Area Site Leader vs Shri Ramesh S/O Shivangouda Patil

Court: Karnataka Dharwad

Decided on: Jul-01-2024

OF JULY, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL WRIT PETITION NO.107705 OF 2023(L-RES) BETWEEN:1. THE AREA SITE LEADER, HARTI VILLAGE, LAXMESHWAR ROAD, WIND WORLD INDIA LTD., NEAR 22KV SUB - STATION, TALUK AND DIST GADAG


Jun 18 2024

Shubh Enclave Site Owners Association vs Seeta Dega

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Jun-18-2024

2090 OF 2020 (CPC) C/W MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 5001 OF 2021(CPC) IN MFA 2090/2020 BETWEEN: SHUBH ENCLAVE SITE OWNERS ASSOCIATION A REGISTERED ASSOCIATION HAVING ITS OFFICE AT GATE NO.1 SHUBH ENCLAVE, HARALUR ROAD, BANGALORE-560102 REPRESENTED BY


Feb 01 2013

Girish Kumar Site Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Decided on: Feb-01-2013

Matched in: Parties Girish Kumar Site Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh


Feb 03 1984

Krishna Coal Site Industry Vs. the Singareni Collieries Co. Ltd. and a ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Feb-03-1984

Reported in: AIR1984AP208

in which the company has been effecting supplies of coal to its customers and the petitioner has no right to make comment in these matters. When these averments were made in the writ petition, Sri Sarathy points out … Y.V. Anjaneyulu, J.1. The petitioner in Writ Petition No. 3947 of 1982 is Krishna Coal Site Industry, Mancherial, represented by its proprietor, Ghansham Das. The petitioner in Writ Petition No. 3948 of 1982 is


Jul 19 2012

Shivalik Vihar Sites Pvt. Ltd. and Others Vs. Gurcharan Singh

Court: National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC

Decided on: Jul-19-2012

years ago are still without any roof. Under these circumstances, petitioners cannot deprive the respondents of their legal rights to have the possession of the flats in question. Thus, there is no illegality or infirmity in the


Jul 09 2012

Shivalik Vihar Sites Pvt. Ltd. Through Director and Others Vs. Gurchar ...

Court: National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC

Decided on: Jul-09-2012

years ago are still without any roof. Under these circumstances, petitioners cannot deprive the respondents of their legal rights to have the possession of the flats in question. Thus, there is no illegality or infirmity in the


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial