Right To Receive - Judgment Search Results
Official Receiver, Kanpur and anr. Vs. Abdul Shakur and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-11-1964
Reported in: AIR1965SC920; [1965]1SCR254
Insolvency Judge by order dated October 8, 1937 adjudicated Kotwaleshwar insolvent and appointed the first appellant the official Receive, Kanpur, as receive of his estate with powers under s. 80 of the Provincial Insolvency Act, 1920 - … Court is not dealing simply between the petitioning creditor and the debtor, but it is interfering with the rights of his other creditors, who, if the order is made, will not he able to sue the debtor
Receivable Management Services India Pvt. Ltd. and a Vs. ............. ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-14-2012
description, all documents of title, deeds, papers, contracts, C.P. No.424/2012 licenses,permissions, approvals, Registration, Page 9 of 10 Authorizations, Rights, lease etc. of the Transferor Company be transferred to and vest in the Transferee Company without any further … Petitioner Companies and the Scheme of Amalgamation needs to be sanctioned by this Court.11. No objection has been received to the Scheme of Amalgamationfrom any other party. In this regard, Mr. Vikas Goel, Advocate of the Petitioner
In reference received from Sessions Judge, Narsinghpur (M.P) and Anoth ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-15-2014
is that the appellant killed the deceased prosecutrix. Hence with the prosecution's evidence the learned Sessions Judge has rightly found that the appellant committed rape upon a 10 year old deceased prosecutrix and killed her.15. The learned … conduct of the appellant is established by these two witnesses to show his guilty conscious that when he received an information that a dog was being called by the Police for smelling purpose, he immediately left the
18-section briefs on any result in this list
The Court Receiver, High Court, as Receiver of the Business and Assets ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Apr-25-2003
Reported in: 2003(3)ALLMR873; 2003(5)BomCR501; 2003(27)PTC555(Bom); [2003]45SCL335(Bom)
the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act. 1958, which confers on the registered proprietor of a trade mark exclusive right to the use of the trade mark in relation to the goods in respect of which the trade mark … as the edible oil being sold under the trade mark 'Postman'.2. The suit is instituted by the Court Receiver who has been appointed as Receiver of the assets of the partnership firm in Suit No. 4913 of
Official Receiver, Prakasham District Vs. Varra Nagi Reddy and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-21-1997
Reported in: 1998(1)ALD151; 1997(6)ALT623
symbolic possession not to disturb the shares of others as it is the official receiver who has the right to deal with it and distribute the assets and discharge the liabilities of the creditors of the judgment debtor … E.A.No.509 of 1997 in E,P.No.20 of 1994 connected with O.S.No-12 of 1987 is challenged.2. Petitioner is the Official Receiver of Prakasham district. He filed an application to stop the sale of the schedule property which was brought
Official Receiver Vs. G. Prabhavathi and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-20-1996
Reported in: 1997(2)ALT91
joint family property alone vests in the Official Receiver. It is contended that the petitioner-Official Receiver has no right to deal with the properties of the sons of the Judgment-debtor. The petitioner contended that under Section 52 of … E.P.No.27 of 1987. The 5th respondent herein filed I.P.No.6 of 1989 and the petitioner was appointed as interim receiver on 26-10-1989 and he took possession of the property on 9-2-1990. Respondents 1 to 4 brought the properties
The Official Receiver Vs. Ariya Boyan S/O. Veera Boyan
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-14-1993
Reported in: (1995)2MLJ537
not having raised that ground at the time of vesting, they must be deemed to have waived that right and so they cannot raise it now. I have heard Mr. S.P. Subramanian, learned Counsel appearing for the … Namakkal. The insolvency court allowed the petition and the estate of the insolvents was vested with the Official Receiver. While so, the respondents filed I.A. No. 123 of 1984 under Section 28(5) of the Provincial Insolvency Act,
Official Receiver, Representing the Estate of the Debtors in I.P. No. ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-18-1994
Reported in: (1995)2MLJ264
surety or sureties from its or his or their liability.I/We further agree that this does not affect your right to give him/them any additional loan on his/their personal security or of others in dependent of this.Further I/We agree … ORDERS.S. Subramani, J.1. The Official Receiver representing the estate of the debtors in I.A. No. 19 of 1977, pending before the Sub Court, Coimbatore
The Official Receiver Vs. R. Annamalai and 2 ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-10-1996
Reported in: 1996(2)CTC536; (1996)IMLJ47
of rent and on the ground of denial of title of the landlord by the tenant. The Official Receiver, North Arcot Ambedkar District and Timvannamalai Sambuvarayar District at Vellore filed an application for impleading him as a
Court Receiver, High Court Vs. Special Land Acquisition Officer
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Apr-09-1981
Reported in: 1982(1)BomCR564
by the Land Acquisition Officer calling upon the claimant to put forth his claim. Mr. Kotwal may be right to that extent. It can be readily accepted that if the Government intended to acquire the land under its … and Suit No. 399/70 has been pending in that behalf in this Court even till this day. Admittedly Receiver was appointed in respect of the property and the receiver was in possession of the lands till 30-3-1970,
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · use +/− or drag to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free