Right To Practise - Judgment Search Results
Mr. Vinay Asharam Rathi, a Practising Advocate Vs. Mr. M.S. Rao, the S ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jan-23-2003
Reported in: 2003(2)ALLMR132; 2003(4)BomCR402; 2003(3)MhLj154
various provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1898, the Apex Court had ruled that the police has statutory right and duty to register every information relating to the commission of a cognizable offence and the police also
Sri M. Rammohan Rao S/O M. Sadashiva Rao, Practising Advocate, Vs. Uni ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Feb-06-2009
is single line. Hassan Manga lore Rail Development Company Limited (for short, 'HMRDCL'), which is entrusted with the right to use the track in terms of an agreement dated 18.03.2004 termed as concession agreement, is exploiting and monopolizing
In Re: Mr. A. Seetharamiah, Second Grade Pleader, Practising in the Di ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-30-1918
Reported in: (1918)35MLJ650
1. In this case the District Judge of Ganjam has reported to the High Court that the respondent has been convicted of keeping a common gaming house in Berhampore Town, an offence under Section 6 of...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free