Right Running - Judgment Search Results

Unit Run Canteen Employees Welfare Association (Regd.) vs.union of Ind ...

Court: Delhi

4 of 5 imagination are the employees of Government or CSD and therefore the reference to CGIT was rightly refused by the impugned order. There is no merit in the writ petition and the same is dismissed.7.

Simpaul vs Runs Mon

Court: Kerala

REZ1_H_0.L1_3_4 0F Zf l22 2 0 2 5 : KER : 2 9 6 7 0 IIN TEE HIGH c:OOHT OF RERALA HT EENAm7ItAM PRESENT RE EH]ro:URABIE rm. ousTlcE A. BADHARrmEEN FRIDAI, THE 4m DHr oF...

Runs Mon vs Simpol

Court: Kerala

of. Registry shall forward a copy of this judgment to the court below concerned, within seven days, for information and compliance. Sd/- A. BADHARUDEEN JUDGE nkr APPENDIX OF OP(C) 13/2019 PETITIONER EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 A TRUE COPY

Saviour College, Run by Kunjan Shiksha Samiti Bhopal Vs. Western Regio ...

Court: Madhya Pradesh

1 W.P. No. 594/2011 31.7.2012 Counsel for the parties present. For the reasons stated in the order passed today separately in W.P. No. 14932/2010 ­Jawaharlal Nehru College v. Barkatullah University and others this petition is also...

Run Detective Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

1. Compliance of the interim order requiring pre-deposit of Rs. 10,000/-is not reported. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed for non-compliance of the order.

Run Bahadoor Singh Vs. Lucho Kooer

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: (1881)ILR6Cal406

injury, but also operates by way of estoppel to any action for an injury to the same supposed right of possession.'5. It is necessary, however, for us to examine a few of the Indian authorities upon this

Trigger - Bai (Run Off) Limited (In Scheme of Arrangement) (Appellant) ...

Court: UK Supreme Court

Acts 29. Much attention was, both below and before the Supreme Court, paid to the development of employees' rights to compensation in respect of personal injury and disease, at common law and under the scheme of the

Lambert Run Coal Co. Vs. Baltimore and Ohio R. Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

1 of the Act to Regulate Commerce; that it was within the emergency powers there conferred; that the rights and duties prescribed by paragraph 12 of that section were not absolute, but were subject to suspension or

Shah Mohanlal Manilal Vs. Firm Running in the Name and Style of Dhirub ...

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: AIR1962Guj56; (1961)0GLR629

P.N. Bhagwati, J. 1. This Second Appeal raises a short question of law regarding the right of a buyer to reject goods taken delivery of by him from the seller and supplied by him

Kameshwar Pershad Vs. Run Bahadur Singh

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: (1885)ILR12Cal458

meaning of Clause (c) of Section 244, The word 'representative' there means any person who succeeds to the right of any of the parties to the suit after the decree is passed. If such rights are transferred