Right Minded - Judgment Search Results

Pennsylvania R. Co. Vs. Minds

Court: US Supreme Court

Pennsylvania R. Co. v. Minds - 250 U.S. 368 (1919) U.S. Supreme Court Pennsylvania R. Co. v. Minds, 250 U.S. 368 (1919) Pennsylvania

Mind Gym Ltd. Vs. Mindgym Kids Library Pvt. Ltd.

Court: Delhi

no other rights come into existence. In my view, it is very convenient, if the defendants are so minded, to adopt any other label that establishes a connection in the course of trade with respect to the … hearing, detailed ex-parte order was passed against the defendant restraining it from infringing and/or passing off the plaintiff’s rights by using the trade mark MINDGYM or any other mark deceptively or confusing similar to the plaintiff’s mark

Shanmughasundaram (Unsound Mind) by Guardian Mother Bagya Rathnammal V ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1979)2MLJ190

appointment as the guardian of the 3rd defendant, who, though a major, was stated to be of unsound mind. There was no counter filed and when the matter came up for final orders the learned Subordinate Judge

Tata Power Delhi Distribution Ltd. Vs.mind Shaper Technologies Pvt. Lt ...

Court: Delhi

its Sales Tax and Service Tax registration documents which referred to the respondent as a company providing online information and data services and selling the digital equipments. It is also averred that its representative has been contacting … DELHI DISTRIBUTION LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Manish Srivastava, Mr. Aditya Gupta and Ms. Moulshree Shukla, Advs. versus MIND SHAPER TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Ayushi Kiran and Mr. Rupeshwar Sandhu, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR

Gma First India (P) Ltd India vs.genius Mind Consultancy Sdn Bhd & Ors ...

Court: Delhi

order was passed:-"“1. The plaintiff instituted the present suit (i) to restrain the defendants No.1&2 from publishing defamatory information relating to the plaintiff on their website and from entering into direct agreements or arrangements with defendant No.3 … 4448/2018(u/O.VIII R.1 CPC) GMA FIRST INDIA (P) LTD INDIA Through: Mr. Vaibhav Arora, Adv. ..... Plaintiff Versus GENIUS MIND CONSULTANCY SDN BHD & ORS.. Defendants Through: Mr. Deepak Agarwal, Mr. S.Santanam Swaminadhan & Mr. Kartik Malhotra, Advs.

M/S Nimbus Harbor Facilities Management Pvt. Ltd. Vs. M/S Mind and Sou ...

Court: Delhi

Judgment delivered on:25. 04.2014 CO. PET. 513/2013 M/S NIMBUS HARBOR FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PVT. LTD. ..... Petitioner versus M/S MIND & SOUL FITNESS PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr

Triumphant Institute of Management Education Pvt. Vs. Aspiring Mind As ...

Court: Delhi

the mark for a series of online employability assessment test amounting to clear infringement of the plaintiff’s coveted rights under the statute as well as common laws.5. The plaintiff had thereafter revealed about its organisation like the … PVT. LTD. …… Plaintiffs Through: Mrs. Pratibha M. Singh, Senior Advocate with Mr. Tejveer Bhatia, Advocate. Versus ASPIRING MIND ASSESSMENT PVT. LTD. & ORS. …… Defendants Through: Mr. Saikrishan Rajagopal, Advocate. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI

M/S.Cool Mind Technologies Private Limited vs Assistant Commissioner o ...

Court: Kerala

MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH THURSDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2024 / 19TH MAGHA, 1945 PETITIONER/S: M/S.COOL MIND TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITED A-5, 2ND FLOOR, TAPASYA, INFOPARK, KAKKANAD, KOCHI-682030, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR ABRAHAM JACOB. BY

M/S.Cool Mind Technologies Private Limited vs Assistant Commissioner o ...

Court: Kerala

OF 2024 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED IN WP(C) NO.9100 OF 2020 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA APPELLANT/PETITIONER M/S.COOL MIND TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITED A-5, 2ND FLOOR, TAPASYA, INFOPARK, KAKKANAD, KOCHI-682030, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR ABRAHAM JACOB., PIN

G.S. Dahiya (Unsound Mind) Vs. Union of India

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 1998VIAD(Delhi)835; 1998(48)DRJ751

the counter, the respondents had narrated the facts but had, on account of very crucial fact, denied the right of the petitioner for the disability pension. The petitioner is entitled to disability pension @ Rs.188/- per month … ORDERK. Ramamoorthy, J. 1. The wife of Mr.J.S.Dahiya who has been declared unsound mind has filed this writ petition claiming the following reliefs:- 'In view of the facts and circumstances stated above,