Right Lined - Judgment Search Results

Lines Vs. Frederick

Court: US Supreme Court

for purposes of the Bankruptcy Act could not be resolved simply by reference to the time when the right to the payment "vested," or to definitions of property drawn from other Page 400 U. S. 20 areas … Lines v. Frederick - 400 U.S. 18 (1970) U.S. Supreme Court Lines v. Frederick, 400 U.S. 18 (1970) Lines

Hy-line International Vs. C and M Hy-line Farms P. Ltd.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: IV(2004)BC424; [2004]120CompCas337(Bom); (2004)2CompLJ503(Bom); 2004(3)MhLj922; [2004]52SCL416(Bom)

(1983)ILLJ45SC is of no avail. In that case, the issue considered by the court was relating to the right of workmen employed in a company to appear and oppose a petition for winding up of the company. … the petition. I have no hesitation in adopting the exposition as made in this decision. On the same lines, is the dictum in the case of Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. v. National Organic Chemical Industries Ltd. (unreported

Hy-line International Vs. C and M Hy-line Farms (P) Ltd.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2004(2)BomCR10; (2004)2CompLJ506(Bom)

also its shareholder on equal basis with the Intervener Company.5. Counsel for the company, in my view, has rightly relied on the decision of the apex court reported in New Horizon Ltd. v. Union of India :

Monson Dray Line, Inc., Vs. Murphy Motor Freight Lines

Court: US Supreme Court

MONSON DRAY LINE, INC., v. MURPHY MOTOR FREIGHT LINES - 355 U.S. 11 (1957) U.S. Supreme Court MONSON DRAY LINE, INC.,

Perma Container (Uk) Line Limited and Another Vs. Perma Container Line ...

Court: Mumbai

Arbitration Act 1996 and the filing of the enforcement petition by the claimant does not affect the statutory right of the respondent (petitioner in this petition) to file the present petition U/s 34 of the Act to … award dated 30th January, 2013. The petitioners in Arbitration Petition No. 259 of 2013 i.e. Perma Container (UK) Line Ltd. are hereinafter referred to as the claimant. The original respondents i.e. Perma Container Line (India) Pvt. Ltd.

The Commissioner of Incometax-I, Aayakar Bhawan, Civil lines, Nagpur V ...

Court: Mumbai Nagpur

liability which arises only after the land is acquired if employment cannot be offered. Therefore, the ITAT has rightly accepted it as the Revenue expenditure. No substantial question also arises on that count. 7. In view of

E.M.U.Lines Private Limited Company Vs. M/S.Blue Ocean Lines Pvt. Ltd. ...

Court: Mumbai

Oral Judgment: By this Summons for Judgment, the Plaintiff seeks to recover a sum of Rs. 4,29,204/- with further interest thereon and cost. The suit is filed on the basis of invoice dated 6th October, 2008....

E.M.U.Lines Private Limited Company Vs. M/S.Blue Ocean Lines Pvt. Ltd. ...

Court: Mumbai

Oral Judgment: By this Summons for Judgment, the Plaintiff seeks to recover a sum of Rs. 4,29,204/- with further interest thereon and cost. The suit is filed on the basis of invoice dated 6th October, 2008....

Sunder theatres (Nandani Talkies), Civil Lines, Jhansi Vs. Allahabad B ...

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: 1998(3)AWC1635

order to fill up the lacuna in the evidence already led, in my view, the Court below has rightly exercised its discretion in rejecting the application to recall Mukund Lal Mehrotra for further examination at the instance … counsel for the applicant-revisionist and Sri P. K. Bisarla for the opposite party No. 1-Allahabad Bank. Jhansl (Civil Lines Branch).3. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that M/s. Sunder Theatres (Nandani Talkies), Civil Lines, Jhansi

Contship Container Lines Ltd. Vs. D.K. Lall and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2010(2)SCALE148

the shipper and the purchaser did not in the instant case reserve in favour of the shipper any right or interest in the goods so as to constitute an insurable interest within the meaning of Section 7 … Lall Enterprises against respondent-National Insurance Company Ltd. while granting relief in part to the complainant against Contship Container Lines Ltd., the shipping company to whom the consignment in question was entrusted for delivery to the consignee in