Right Heir - Judgment Search Results

Heirs of Vrajlal J. Ganatra Vs. Heirs of Parshottam S. Shah

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 1996IVAD(SC)256; 1996(2)CTC95; (1997)137CTR(SC)103; (1996)2GLR361; [1996]222ITR391(SC); JT1996(4)SC725; (1996)2MLJ76(SC); 1996(II)OLR(SC)225; (1996)113PLR334; 1996(4)SCALE5

run by the assessee-company itself and the profits flowing from the exhibition of films at these two theatres rightly belong to the assessee. The Tribunal did not take into consideration all the above facts and circumstances pointed … K.T. Thomas, J.1. Legal heirs of a plaintiff (Vrajlal J. Ganatra) who suffered defeat both at the original side as well as at

Heirs of Anjana Samji Chela Vs. Heirs of Anjana Hirji Ahiji

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: (2000)3GLR451

life time of Dalji Sardar. Thus, Dalji Sardar left behind him Mena Bai being his widow as his heir. Over and above the said Mena Bai, deceased Dalji left behind him Kunvarben, his mother and two sisters … brother and sister. Their father died about a year before the date of the suit. They have claimed rights in the suit properties as agnates in the family headed by Samabhai Surjibhai as per the pedigree set

Heirs of Vrajlal J. Ganatra and ors. Vs. Heirs of Parshottam S. Shah a ...

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: AIR1996Guj147; (1996)2GLR361

that the defendant is merely a benamidar of the plaintiff and that the defendant does not have the right of ownership in the suit property. The trial court raised 14 issues. All of them were decided against

Heirs of Badarmal H. JaIn and Gautamchand B. JaIn Vs. Heirs of Ratanbe ...

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: (2001)4GLR3301

only use to which the property can be put to, it would be a serious restriction upon the right of the tenant, which restriction is not specifically contemplated by the terms of the lease.7.3 The 'Dominant Purpose

Heir of Kashiben C. Chhaganlal D/O Chimanlal Chhaganlal Vs. Heirs of B ...

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: (2001)2GLR1320

decree for eviction u/s. 12(3)(a) of the Act. It was further laid down that where the landlord has right to recover the amount from the tenant in addition to standard rent it is open to the parties … on the ground that the tenants had made compliance of Section 12(3)(b) of the Bombay Rent Act. The heirs of the deceased land-lady has filed this Revision.6. I have heard Shri M.T.M. Hakim, learned Counsel for the

McArthur's Heirs Vs. Dun's Heirs

Court: US Supreme Court

lands, and, having done so in regard to the lands of C. Bradford, the complainant Galloway had no right to enter the same." Authority so directly in point leaves little room for comment; indeed, it may be … McArthur's Heirs v. Dun's Heirs - 48 U.S. 262 (1849) U.S. Supreme Court McArthur's Heirs v. Dun's Heirs, 48 U.S.

Vithalbhai Biharilal Patel Since Deced. Thro. His Heirs Vs. Heirs of D ...

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: (2003)4GLR635

tenant within the meaning of section 5(11)(c) of the Rent Act. If at all the plaintiffs have a right to recover the possession of the suit premises, they should claim the same against the said Jaikishan afresh. … hardship. Pending the suit, the defendant died. His widow, the sons and the daughter were substituted as the heirs and legal representatives of the deceased defendant. The learned trial Judge was, under the judgment and order dated

Late Chaturbhuj Mulji, Thro' His Heirs Vs. Heirs and Legal Rep. of Dec ...

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: (2001)4GLR3343

Rs. 75,000/-. Firm of Ranchhoddas Meghji, appellants herein (original defendant) owed certain amount for which it assigned the right, title and interest in the said property by a registered deed dated April 23, 1956 in favour of … recovering an amount of Rs. 89,650/- . Defendant No.5 died during the pendency of the proceedings and his heirs and legal representatives were brought on record as defendant Nos. 5(a) to 5 (f) . On April 29,

Sital Chandra Kolley and anr. Vs. Heirs of Mihilal Kolley and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1955Cal21,58CWN1000

that, in any event, it was not enforceable against them and could not affect or prevail over their right' in respect of the disputed property. They claimed to have become absolutely entitled to the suit property as

Chand Kaur (D) Thro Lrs Heirs . Vs. Mehar Kaur (D) Thro Her Legal Heir ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

property of late Jaimal Singh in equal shares and the legal heirs of Chand Kaur shall have no right to such property at all.” 6. This Court has consistently held that the High Court has no jurisdiction … The findings of the ld. lower Appellate Court are modified to the extent that Mehar Singh and legal heirs of Mehar Kaur are held entitled to succeed to the entire property of late Jaimal Singh in equal