Richard Roe - Judgment Search Results

Ram Lal Vs. Sita Ram and ors.

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: (1896)ILR18All440

my belief they have managed to decree possession of land during that time without impleading John Doe and Richard Roe, and 1 think that the action for recovery of land in India has a history and a character … that any system of law can produce. I mean that connected with the names of John Doe and Richard Roe.10. The Civil Courts have been in existence in India for more than a hundred years. To the best

T. Munuswami Naidu (Died) and ors. Vs. R. Venkata Reddi and ors.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: AIR1978AP200

individual rights. It tries questions of the highest social import as mere private controversies between John Doe and Richard Roe, and is so zealous to secure fair play to the individual that often it secures very little fair

Obg Limited and Others (Appellants) Vs. Allan and Others (Respondents)

Court: House of Lords

system, English law has outgrown the need for legal fictions. There was a time when John Doe and Richard Roe were popular characters. They had to be parties to some forms of action. When they were in their … their names appeared again and again in the law reports. English law has moved on. John Doe and Richard Roe are no more. So here, if there is to be a limit to the types of intangibles which

Secretary of State for Environment, Food, and Rural Affairs (Responden ...

Court: UK Supreme Court

Matched in: Advocate Appellant: Richard Drabble QC, Marc Willers, (Instructed by Community Law Partnership). Respondent: John Hobson QC, John Clargo, (Instructed by Whitehead Vizard ).

Boy Scouts of America Vs. Dale

Court: US Supreme Court

his sexual orientation to the newspapers may, of course, be a matter of great importance to John Doe. Richard Roe, however, may be much more interested in the weekend weather forecast. Before Dale made his statement at Rutgers,

Malone Vs. Bowdin

Court: US Supreme Court

as a lessee of the respondents, had entered the land in question and had been forceably ejected by Richard Roe. The petitioner and the United States were served with process, which was accompanied by a "Notice to the … United States were served with process, which was accompanied by a "Notice to the Real Defendants," stating that Richard Roe had "acted as casual ejector only." The subsequent dismissal of the United States as a petitioner is not

Alabama Power Co. Vs. Ickes

Court: US Supreme Court

a vista of litigation hitherto unrevealed. John Doe, let us suppose, is engaged in operating a grocery store. Richard Roe, desiring to open a rival and competing establishment, seeks a loan from a manufacturing concern which, under its … prove injurious to him and this result is foreseen and expected both by the lender and the borrower, Richard Roe? Certainly not, unless we are prepared to lay down the general rule that A, who will suffer damage

United States Vs. Lefkowitz

Court: US Supreme Court

of making the complaint Henry Miller (meaning respondent Lefkowitz), Jane Doe (meaning respondent Paris), and another person called Richard Roe did conspire to sell, possess, transport, furnish, deliver, and take orders for intoxicating liquor contrary to the National

Burdick Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

session in the Southern District of New York in a proceeding entitled, 'United States v. John Doe and Richard Roe,' as to the sources of the information which he had in the New York Tribune office, or in

West Vs. Cabell

Court: US Supreme Court

a riot in resisting the arrest of Crotty upon a warrant commanding the arrest of "John Doe or Richard Roe, whose other or true name is to your complainant unknown," the conviction was set aside by the Supreme