Revenue - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: revenue Page 1 of about 3,969 results (0.048 seconds)Shonkh Technologies Vs. Revenue
Court: Authority for Advance Rulings
Reported in: (2004)(93)ECC546
Appellants: Shonkh Technologies International Ltd. Vs.Shah Mohammed Quadri, Chairman, K.N. Chaturvedi and Somnath Pal, Members Sanjeev Sachdeva, Addl. Director General...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe District Revenue Officer Vs. R. Palanisamy, Assistant, Erode Distr ...
Court: Chennai
Reported in: (2006)1MLJ169
Rules and he was dismissed from service as per District Revenue Officer's proceedings dated 6-7-86. Against this order, he preferred an
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTinland Revenue Commissioners Vs. Collco Dealings Ltd. Inland Revenue C ...
Court: Kolkata
Reported in: [1961]43ITR125(Cal)
the later enactment in England in 1948, that the English Revenue authorities and, as Mr. Foster says, Parliament itself, proceeded on
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Revenue Divisional Officer and anr. Vs. V.K. Ramanathan
Court: Chennai
Reported in: (1972)2MLJ410
effect from 5th May, 1967. On 13th May, 1967, the Revenue Divisional Officer, who had acted as Special Officer in the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBoard of Revenue for Rajasthan, Ajmer and ors. Vs. Rao Bal Deo Singh a ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Reported in: AIR1968SC898; [1968]2SCR661
in the manner prescribed by Rule 28. The Board of Revenue accordingly set aside the order of the Additional Jagir Commissioner
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKishoresingh Vs. Revenue Board, Rajasthan and anr.
Court: Rajasthan
Reported in: AIR1953Raj37
not thus be called courts subordinate to the Board of Revenue. We may point out that it was only a matter
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHarji Vs. Revenue Board of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Reported in: AIR1952Raj132
case of the opposite party. Before the passing of the Revenue Courts Procedure and Jurisdiction Act of 1951 the Rajasthan Board
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDepartment of Revenue Vs. Stevedoring Assn.
Court: US Supreme Court
Judgment on Validity of Rule, App. 3-7, petitioner Department of Revenue accepted paragraph VI of that petition. That paragraph alleged that
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDepartment of Revenue of Mont. Vs. Kurth Ranch
Court: US Supreme Court
although the Act's preamble evinces a clear motivation to raise revenue, it also indicates that the tax will provide for anticrime
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDepartment of Revenue of Ky. Vs. Davis
Court: US Supreme Court
ibid., and they allow for public work beyond what current revenues could support, see id., 1.2, at 1213. Bond proceeds are
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>