Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Reveal - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 18 2013

“it Has Been Revealed That the Petitioner Had Already Taken Vs. Stat ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Feb-18-2013

necessary to adjourn the case to await appearance on behalf of the petitioner. A perusal of the pleadings, reveals that Lachhman Kaur, respondent No.4, filed a petition under Section 42 of the East Punjab Holdings (Consolidation and


Dec 10 2012

“perusal of File Reveals That the Star Witness of This Case Vs. Amar ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Dec-10-2012

prosecution. To give benefit of doubt to the respondents, it was observed as under :- “Perusal of file reveals that the star witness of this case Amarjit Singh while appearing into the witness box stated that Paramjit


Mar 05 2014

“perusal of File Reveals That Vide Application Dated 28.10.2013 Plai ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Mar-05-2014

by virtue of impugned order (Annexure P2), which, in substance, is as under (para 5):- “Perusal of file reveals that vide application dated 28.10.2013 plaintiff had sought permission for amendment of plaint vide application dated 28.10.2013. The


  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial