Reveal - Judgment Search Results
“it Has Been Revealed That the Petitioner Had Already Taken Vs. Stat ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Feb-18-2013
necessary to adjourn the case to await appearance on behalf of the petitioner. A perusal of the pleadings, reveals that Lachhman Kaur, respondent No.4, filed a petition under Section 42 of the East Punjab Holdings (Consolidation and
“perusal of File Reveals That the Star Witness of This Case Vs. Amar ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Dec-10-2012
prosecution. To give benefit of doubt to the respondents, it was observed as under :- “Perusal of file reveals that the star witness of this case Amarjit Singh while appearing into the witness box stated that Paramjit
“perusal of File Reveals That Vide Application Dated 28.10.2013 Plai ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Mar-05-2014
by virtue of impugned order (Annexure P2), which, in substance, is as under (para 5):- “Perusal of file reveals that vide application dated 28.10.2013 plaintiff had sought permission for amendment of plaint vide application dated 28.10.2013. The
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free