Returned - Judgment Search Results

Ganpat Vs. Returning Officer and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1975SC420; (1975)1SCC589; [1975]2SCR923

No. 5) tendered by the respondent No. 11 to the Returning Officer a valid one ?(b) Did the notice of withdrawal

Returning Officer Vs. Chamiyar

Court: Kerala

Reported in: 2006(2)KLT878

the opinion that on the date of his election a returned candidate was not qualified, or was disqualified, to be chosen

Kunti Vs. Returning Officer, Nagar Panchayat, Bagbahara and Others

Court: Chhattisgarh

unpredictability. In such a situation, declaring the election of the returned candidate on the ground of his initial disqualification to contest

Purushottam Vs. Returning Officer, Amravati and Others

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: AIR1992Bom227

second respondent Vasant Purushottam Maldhure (hereinafter referred to as 'the returned candidate') was declared elected. The petitioner challenged the said election

Ebrahim Vs. Returning Officer

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR1995KAR2181; 1995(6)KarLJ470

to be held on 26.4.1995. The first respondent was the Returning Officer. On 20.4.1995 the first respondent took up scrutiny of

Returning Officer-cum-project Officer, Khammam and Another Vs. Vooka A ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 1999(6)ALD643; 1999(6)ALT94

the same and the application which was filed before the Returning Officer seeking extension of time of two hours to file

Siddaiah Vs. Returning Officer, Bangalore and ors.

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: AIR1988Kant135; ILR1987KAR595

cross-examination of respondent-1, a memo was filed stating that the returned candidate Krishan (R-2) has died on 30-9-1985 but notwithstanding the

Prahlad Vs. Returning Officer of Shree Balaji Adimjati Seva Sahkari Sa ...

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: AIR1990MP11; 1989MPLJ170

A Joan is a sum of money lent to be returned with or without interest, It is not the case of

Shashikalabai Vs. Returning Officer, Gram Panchayat Election, Umri and ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: AIR1968Bom445; (1968)70BOMLR310; 1968MhLJ391

also filed her nomination paper in the same ward. The Returning Officer ruled that inasmuch as respondent No. 3 Gokurnabai had

Tundilal Vs. Returning Officer and ors.

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: AIR1965MP256; 1965MPLJ897

for quashing an order dated 22nd November 1964 of the Returning Officer, Block Lalbarra, rejecting his nomination paper for election as