Restrictive Trade Practice - Judgment Search Results
Ankur Exports Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-26-2010
Reported in: 2010CompLR43,[2010]100SCL1(Delhi)
POWER OF THE COMMISSION TO AWARD COMPENSATION.(1) Where, as a result of the monopolistic or restrictive, or unfair, trade practice, carried on by any undertaking or any person, any loss or damage is caused to the Central Government, … 226 of the Constitution of India seeking to challenge the impugned order dated 13.11.2000 of the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission ('the Commission' for short) which raises the issue of interpretation of Section 12B of the Monopolies
Hindustan Lever Ltd. and anr. Vs. Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Pra ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-24-1999
Reported in: 1999IIIAD(Delhi)515; [1999]97CompCas382(Delhi); 79(1999)DLT234; 1999(49)DRJ329
'Colgate') filed a complaint along with complainant No. 2, claiming to be a consumer, before the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission (hereinafter referred to as the 'Commission') against M/s. Hindustan Lever Limited complaining that the advertisement campaign … a complaint along with complainant No. 2, claiming to be a consumer, before the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission (hereinafter referred to as the 'Commission') against M/s. Hindustan Lever Limited complaining that the advertisement campaign of
Pennwalt (i) Ltd. and anr. Vs. Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practi ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-10-1998
Reported in: AIR1999Delhi23; [1999]97CompCas163(Delhi); 74(1998)DLT422; 1998(46)DRJ434
Both empower the commission to hold inquiry under Section 10 on receipt of a complaint of monopo-listic or restrictive trade practice and under section 36B on receipt of complaint of unfair trade practice. Section 36C is pari materia to
18-section briefs on any result in this list
R.C. Sood and Co. (P) Ltd. Vs. Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practi ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-21-1996
Reported in: [1996]86CompCas626(Delhi); 62(1996)DLT272; 1996(38)DRJ118
apart from seeking other reliefs, has claimed compensation for loss caused to him as a result of the restrictive trade practice carried on by the petitioners.(4) The first and the second petitioners on receipt of a notice of the
Tanfac Industries Ltd., Rep. by M.H. Upadhyaya, Joint President Vs. Mo ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-05-2003
Reported in: 2003(155)ELT251(Mad)
is valid or not. The Commission cannot prohibit import, its jurisdiction commences after import is completed and any restrictive trade practice takes place. 50. Customs duty on import of any goods is levied under the provisions of the Customs … have jurisdiction under Section 37 to pass orders if such a sale was to amount to being a restrictive trade practice. For the Commission to have jurisdiction to pass such an order, whether interim or final, it must come
Sushil Kumar Dalmia and anr. Vs. Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Prac ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Sep-21-1992
Reported in: (1993)2CALLT320(HC),[1994]79CompCas568(Cal)
a representative capacity and prayed for a writ of mandamus commanding respondent . No. 1, the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission, having its office at Bikaner House, Shahjahan Road, New Delhi, to quash, recall and cancel the … New Delhi, raising specific complaints regarding the issue and alleging the violation of restrictions and indulging in unfair trade practice in offering the debentures to the general public. On September 4, 1992, an application under Section 12A of
Raymond Woollen Mills Ltd. Vs. Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practi ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jul-05-1976
Reported in: [1979]49CompCas686(Bom)
said impugned Notice of Enquiry and the impugned order and from taking further steps in the matter of Restrictive Trade Practice Enquiry No. 27 of 1974. An order directing the 2nd respondent not to participate in the said enquiry … Again, sub-s. (e) of s. 2 defines 'goods', sub-s. (s) 'trade', sub-s. (u) 'trade practice', and sub-s. (o) 'restrictive trade practice' which is as follows : '2. (o) 'Restrictive trade practice' means a trade practice which has, or may
Crompton Greaves Ltd. Vs. Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices C ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jul-05-1976
Reported in: [1979]49CompCas757(Bom)
their goods. The understanding/arrangement amongst the respondents for uniform tendering and/or uniform fixation of selling prices is a restrictive trade practice and is prejudicial to public interest. 8. In para. 17 of the application, it is alleged that the … various clauses fall under s. 33 of the MRTP Act, which provides that any agreement relating to a restrictive trade practice falling within one or more of the categories mentioned in cls. (a) to (1) of sub-s. (1) thereof
Raymond Wollen Mills Ltd. Vs. Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practic ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jun-16-1982
Reported in: 1983(1)BomCR447; 1983MhLJ550
lacking in all particulars those allegations are. They are merely general allegations constituting heads of different classes of restrictive trade practice and communicating no information whatever to the party to whom the said notice was issued. The inquiry that
Motor Industries Company Limited Vs. Monopolies and Restrictive Trade ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-20-1986
Reported in: [1990]67CompCas418(Kar)
for the following reliefs (i) To issue a writ of certiorari, quashing the order if the respondent in Restrictive Trade Practice Enquiry No.8 of 1982 on the petitioner's application dated September 20, 1982 made under regulation 66 of the … Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969, it is open to the first respondent to enquire into any restrictive trade practice : (i) upon receiving a complaint of facts which constitute such practice from any trade or consumers association
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free