Skip to content


Restrictive Trade Practice - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: restrictive trade practice Page 1 of about 16 results (0.041 seconds)
Jul 05 1976 (HC)

Raymond Woollen Mills Ltd. Vs. Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practi ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: [1979]49CompCas686(Bom)

Government its findings thereon. Section 37 relates to investigation into restrictive trade practices by the commission. Sub-section (4) of that section Cas 297 it was urged that an enquiry into restrictive trade practices by the Commission is required by law to be is, therefore, in the interest of a party to postpone practices so as to draw the maximum gains. 59. In Management

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 05 1976 (HC)

Crompton Greaves Ltd. Vs. Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices C ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: [1979]49CompCas757(Bom)

my opinion, no ambiguity or vagueness in the allegations of restrictive trade practices mentioned in clause 15(a), (b), (c), (d) and the MRTP Act, which provides for an enquiry into restrictive trade practices by the Commission upon an application made to it well be contended that the same amounts to restrictive trade practice inasmuch as it restricts or is likely to restrict the

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 20 1986 (HC)

Motor Industries Company Limited Vs. Monopolies and Restrictive Trade ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: [1990]67CompCas418(Kar)

necessary facts and circumstances which go to establish the alleged restrictive trade practices and states the same in the notice of that such exercise of power attracts the charge of 'restrictive trade practice'. Therefore, para (ii) (a) and (b) of the notice for the Commission to enquire into the alleged restrictive trade practice on the information received by it, it must state in

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 20 1986 (HC)

Motor Industries Co. Ltd. Vs. Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practic ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR1986KAR2844

writ of certiorari, quashing the order of the Respondent in Restrictive Trade practice Enquiry No. 8/1982 on the petitioner's application dated Section 2(0) of the Act, which leads thus :'(O) 'Restrictive trade practice' means a trade practice which has, or may have, required to go into whether there is any restrictive trade practice committed by the petitioner; whereas the subject-matter of the suits

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 21 1992 (HC)

Sushil Kumar Dalmia and anr. Vs. Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Prac ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: (1993)2CALLT320(HC),[1994]79CompCas568(Cal)

a specific complaint under the provisions of the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969. Respondent No. 1 has entertained the an application under Section 12A of the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969, was verified by respondent No. 2, Director-General inter alia :The Commission may enquire into any unfair trade practices : (a) upon receiving a complaint of facts which constitutes

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 26 2010 (HC)

Ankur Exports Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices ...

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 2010CompLR43,[2010]100SCL1(Delhi)

the respondents argued that the relief under Section 12-B is restrictive in nature. If it is so, it is only within or, as the case may be, trader or class of traders or consumer may, without prejudice to the right of such or impliedly barred. In case of an illegal or prohibited practice or a monopolistic, restrictive or unfair trade practice, a civil

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 16 1982 (HC)

Raymond Wollen Mills Ltd. Vs. Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practic ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1983(1)BomCR447; 1983MhLJ550

the Joint Director of Investigation appointed under the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 (hereinafter for the sake of brevity commission finds that a monopolistic undertaking is indulging in restrictive trade practices, it might, after passing orders provided in sub-section (1) restrictive trade practices or for evidence of instances of such practices to which the appellants were not entitled. The Commission further

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 10 1998 (HC)

Pennwalt (i) Ltd. and anr. Vs. Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practi ...

Court: Delhi

Reported in: AIR1999Delhi23; [1999]97CompCas163(Delhi); 74(1998)DLT422; 1998(46)DRJ434

:- (1) Where, as a result of the monopolistic or restrictive, or unfair, trade practice, carried on by any undertaking or show cause notice was issued by the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission (hereinafter referred to as the Commission), to the a result of the monopolistic or restrictive, or unfair, trade practice, carried on by any undertaking or any person, any loss

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 21 1996 (HC)

R.C. Sood and Co. (P) Ltd. Vs. Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practi ...

Court: Delhi

Reported in: [1996]86CompCas626(Delhi); 62(1996)DLT272; 1996(38)DRJ118

the second respondent under Section 12-B of the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 (for short 'the Mrtp Act') claiming the Act staling that the petitioners had indulged in restrictive trade practices in the mailer of sale of flat to the who has indulged in monopolistic or restrictive or unfair trade practice, to make payment to the applicant of the amount determined

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 05 2003 (HC)

Tanfac Industries Ltd., Rep. by M.H. Upadhyaya, Joint President Vs. Mo ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 2003(155)ELT251(Mad)

party to the said proceedings before the said Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission. The 3rd respondent also has not furnished and binding. The said direction of the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission alone has been taken into consideration in arriving a sale was to amount to being a restrictive trade practice. For the Commission to have jurisdiction to pass such an

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //