Restricted - Judgment Search Results

Registrar of Restrictive Trade Vs. Steel Age Industries Ltd.

Court: Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

Reported in: (1976)46CompCas607NULL

1. This is an application by the Registrar of Restrictive Trade Agreements (hereinafter for the sake of brevity referred to as "the Registrar") against M/s. Steel Age Industries

Registrar of Restrictive Trade Vs. Ex-cello India Ltd. and ors.

Court: Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

Reported in: (1976)46CompCas605NULL

1. The Registrar of Restrictive Trade Agreements has filed the present application under Sections 10(a)(iii) and 37 against 5 parties. Of these, the

Registrar of Restrictive Trade Vs. Centron Industrial Alliance Pvt.

Court: Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

Reported in: (1978)48CompCas813NULL

blades in the country. He also alleged that the restrictive trade practices indulged in by the respondent limited, restricted and distorted competition, imposed unjustified costs on the consumers and obstructed the flow of capital and resources into

Registrar of Restrictive Trade Vs. Chandan Metal Products Pvt. Ltd.

Court: Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

1. This is an application filed by the Registrar of Restrictive Trade Agreements (hereinafter for the sake of brevity referred to as " the Registrar ") against the respondent

Registrar of Restrictive Trade Vs. Usha Sales Private Ltd.

Court: Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

which there was a collective agreement between the newspaper proprietors and the retail newsagents and that almost automatically restricted competition both between the producers and between the retail agents. Without prejudice to those arguments he pointed out

Registrar of Restrictive Trade Vs. Escorts Ltd.

Court: Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

Reported in: (1979)49CompCas243NULL

1. This is an application filed by the Registrar of Restrictive Trade Agreements (hereinafter referred to as " the Registrar") praying that the respondent may be directed to make

Registrar of Restrictive Trade Vs. Shriram Pistons and Rings Ltd.

Court: Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

Reported in: (1979)49CompCas126NULL

no justification for the amendment application, that the amendment would be justified only if it related to a restrictive trade practice, that para. 6 of the original and amended applications of the Registrar referred only to Section

Registrar of Restrictive Trade Vs. Tata Oil Mills Co. Ltd.

Court: Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

1. This is an application by the Registrar of Restrictive Trade Agreements under Section 10(a)(iii) of the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969. The respondent is registered

Registrar of Restrictive Trade Vs. United Breweries Ltd. and anr.

Court: Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

Reported in: (1989)65CompCas656NULL

1. This is an application under Section 10(a)(iii) read with Section 37 of the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969, for enquiry into restrictive trade practices which fall under Sub-clauses (a) and (g) of

Registrar of Restrictive Trade Vs. Tata Engineering and Locomotive

Court: Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

Reported in: (1976)46CompCas470NULL

1. This is an application by the Registrar of Restrictive Trade Agreements (hereinafter for the sake of brevity referred to as "the Registrar") against Tata Engineering & Locomotive