Rest - Judgment Search Results

M/S Rest House Developers vs Matangi Iron and Steel Company

Court: Karnataka

S.G.PANDIT AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1177 OF 2023 (MON) BETWEEN:1. M/S REST HOUSE DEVELOPERS,A PARTNERSHIP FIRM REGISTERED UNDER THE INDIAN PARTNERSHIP ACT, 1932 (WRONGLY MENTIONED IN THE JUDGMENT AS A

Firm Delux Rest House Vs. Prem Kumar and Anr

Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur

S.B. Civil Second Appeal No.208/2009 Firm Delux Rest House Vs. Prem Kumar & Anr. Judgment, Tuesday, 08/09/2015 1 of 19 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE

Mr. Mohanlal Jindal vs M/S. Rest House Developers

Court: Karnataka

ROAD, CHETPET, CHENNAI-600031. … APPELLANTS (BY SRI B.K.SAMPATH KUMAR, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR SRI SURAJ SAMPATH, ADVOCATE) AND:1. M/S. REST HOUSE DEVELOPERSA PARTNERSHIP FIRM, REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNER, MR. AVINASH PRABHU, HAVING ITS OFFICE AT 206 AND 207

Mr Sushil Kumar Jindal vs M/S Rest House Developers

Court: Karnataka

CHETPET, CHENNAI-600031. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI B.K. SAMPATH KUMAR, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR SRI SURAJ S., ADVOCATE) -2- AND:1. M/S. REST HOUSE DEVELOPERS,A PARTNERSHIP FIRM, REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNER, MR. AVINASH PRABHU, HAVING ITS OFFICE AT 206 AND 207,

Pelana Pathiranalage Rahula Ananda Senasinghe Perera of Ilukbadagama V ...

Court: Sri Lanka Supreme Court

Matched in: Parties Pelana Pathiranalage Rahula Ananda Senasinghe Perera of Ilukbadagama Vs. Dissanayake Mudiyanselage Kithsiri Bandara Dissanayake of peak View Rest

Ramnath Vishnu Waringe Prop. of Hotel Gurudev and Ajit Chandrakant Sat ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2003(2)ALLMR15; 2003(4)BomCR575; 2003(2)MhLj270

Licence. Firstly, it was stated that the dance floor was functioning up to 2 a.m., and thus, timing restriction, which ought to have been observed by the appellant-petitioner, had not been observed. Secondly, fire-fighting equipments were insufficient