Response - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: response Year: 2001 Page 1 of about 301 results (0.057 seconds)Tulsidas P. Kheraj and anr. Vs. Association of Engineering Workers and ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-15-2001
Reported in: 2001(4)ALLMR79; (2001)3BOMLR395; (2002)IVLLJ941Bom; 2001(3)MhLj572
..... to a party on lease the lessor does not become liableor responsible for the acts and omissions committed by the proprietor of the ..... a party on lease the lessor does not become liable or responsible for the acts and omissions committed by the proprietor of the ..... specifically pointed out that the proposed respondents had any share or responsibility of any nature in the business of the lessee it was .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe India Cements Limited Represented by Its Managing Director Vs. Dir ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-14-2001
Reported in: (2001)3MLJ484
..... being carried on through the managing director of the company who discharges his duties and responsibilities under the guidance and supervision of the board of directors of the company the general ..... with hazardous materials and the escape routes which the employers had found to shift their responsibilities on some employee or the other and escape punishment and penalty led to the amendment .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMckune Vs. Lile
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Nov-28-2001
..... granting use immunity participants would still obtain all the therapeutic benefits of accepting responsibility and admitting past misconduct they simply would not incriminate themselves in the process ..... in order to have a sex offender treatment program that involves admission of responsibility alternatively the state could continue to pursue its rehabilitative goals without violating participants .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNlrb Vs. Kentucky River Community Care, Inc.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-29-2001
..... apply its limiting interpretation of independent judgment to any supervisory function other than responsibly directing other employees is particularly troubling because just seven years ago we rejected ..... further that it justifies limiting this categorical exclusion to the supervisory function of responsibly directing other employees these contentions contradict both the text and structure of the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAshish Kapuria Vs. Baba Farid University of Health Sciences, Faridkot ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Aug-30-2001
Reported in: AIR2002P& H80
..... provides ample opportunity for the respondents to tamper with the omr response sheets to cause prejudice to the candidates 2 though in ..... fast evaluation process still as a matter of caution the correct responses were fed to the computer after entire scanning had been ..... process was undertaken by a committee of very senior and responsible officers being headed by the vice chancellor itself 10 the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTC.K. Mishra, I.F.S. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Rep. by Its
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Hyderabad
Decided on: Oct-12-2001
..... of divisional forest officer flying squad division nalgonda as there were practically no duties and responsibilities corresponding to ifs cadre post he filed representation on 22 12 99 requesting to post ..... the post of divisional forest officer flying squad division nalgonda as equivalent in status and responsibility to the cadre post of deputy conservator of forests is unlawful and hence the transfer .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTChandra Bhan Bansal Vs. Deputy Commissioner of
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Agra
Decided on: Jun-29-2001
..... that merely because the assessee has filed return of income in response to notice under section 148 it will not confer any jurisdiction ..... such notice is that the assessee must be aware of its responsibility and liabilities so that he can defend himself from the impending ..... 2 was applicable or not in respect of returns filed in response to notice under section 148 of the act we therefore quote .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTS.C. Chhabra Vs. Gontermann Peipers (India) Ltd.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Dec-05-2001
Reported in: 2002CriLJ1642
..... actively involved in the entire business of the company and were responsible to the company for the conduct of the business as well ..... actively involved in the entire business of the company and were responsible to the company for the conduct of the business of the ..... the director of the accused company was also in charge of and responsible for the business of the accused company in the appeal before .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTS.R. Chaudhuri Vs. State of Punjab and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Aug-17-2001
Reported in: AIR2001SC2707; 2001(4)Crimes145(SC); JT2001(6)SC446; 2001(5)SCALE269; (2001)7SCC126
..... indicate the privilege to extend only for six months 34 the very concept of responsible government and representative democracy signifies government by the people in constitutional terms it denotes ..... must for ever remain conscious of their constitutional obligations and not sacrifice either political responsibility or parliamentary conventions at the altar of political expediency prof b o nwabueze in .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPremchand Jute Mills Ltd. and ors. Vs. Regional Provident Fund Commiss ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: May-14-2001
Reported in: [2002(93)FLR1107],(2002)IILLJ776Cal
..... the affairs of such factory or establishment in charge of and responsible for the conduct of the business of the company and ..... contributing its share of provident fund how other directors could be responsible to face the criminal prosecution i am afraid if any ..... the affairs of such factory or establishment in charge of and responsible for the conduct of business of the company and compliance of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial