Response - Judgment Search Results

income Tax Officer Vs. Sms Schloemann Siemag

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad

Reported in: (1996)55TTJ(Hyd.)580

..... for insufficient performance of the guaranteed figures while the indian contractor mechanical will be responsible directly to the purchaser through the separate contract as aforesaid for performing the ..... prime contractors shall remain liable to perform fulfil and discharge all the obligations and responsibilities under this agreement for the design manufacture delivery of plant its workmanship and .....

income-tax Officer Vs. Sms Schloemann Siemag

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad

Reported in: (1996)57ITD254(Hyd.)

..... for insufficient performance of the guaranteed figures while the indian contractor mechanical will be responsible directly to the purchaser through the separate contract as aforesaid for performing the ..... prime contractors shall remain liable to perform fulfill and discharge all the obligations and responsibilities under this agreement for the design manufacture delivery of plant its workmanship and .....

Missouri Vs. Jenkins

Court: US Supreme Court

..... mandatory interdistrict reassignment of students throughout the detroit metropolitan area was an impermissible interdistrict response to the intradistrict violation identified 418 u s at 745 in that case ..... in addressing difficult educational problems state and local school officials not only bear the responsibility for educational decisions they also are better equipped than a single federal judge .....

Assistant Commissioner of Vs. Guru Trust

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT

Reported in: (1996)57ITD247(Bang.)

..... comparison etc form them the meaning of the words person responsible for paying has been defined in section 204 according to ..... which the payer himself is person responsible for paying without dragging the said matter into the labyrinth ..... assessees themselves who will have to be considered as persons responsible for paying the interest amount and not the actual individual .....

Seminole Tribe of FlA. Vs. Florida

Court: US Supreme Court

..... be at odds with another today however the court is not struggling to fulfill a responsibility to reconcile two arguably conflicting and delphic constitutional provisions nor is it struggling with any ..... 379 380 because neither text precedent nor history supports the majority s abdication of our responsibility to exercise the jurisdiction entrusted to us in article iii i would reverse the judgment .....

Vernonia School Dist. 47j Vs. Acton

Court: US Supreme Court

..... upon corporal punishment would entail a significant intrusion into an area of primary educational responsibility fourth amendment rights no less than first and fourteenth amendment rights are different ..... the court explains ante at 655 656 schools have traditionally had special guardianlike responsibilities for children that necessitate a degree of constitutional leeway this principle explains the .....

Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs Vs. Newport News Sh ...

Court: US Supreme Court

..... that frustrate the purposes 123 of their statutes absent some clear and distinctive responsibility conferred upon the agency an adversely affected or aggrieved judicial review provision leaves ..... insufficient is the director s asserted interest in fulfilling important administrative and enforcement responsibilities she fails to identify any specific statutory duties that an erroneous board ruling .....

Board of Comm'rs, Wabaunsee Cty. Vs. Umbehr

Court: US Supreme Court

..... a longstanding tradition can deprive independent contractors of protection its own description of lowest responsible bidder requirements in a wide range of government contracting laws voluntarily adopted by ..... terminate both employees and contractors for poor performance to improve the efficiency efficacy and responsiveness of service to the public and to prevent the appearance of corruption and .....

Assistant Commissioner of Vs. Guru Trust.

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT

Reported in: (1996)56TTJ(Bang.)73

..... comparison etc form them the meaning of the words person responsible for paying has been defined in section 204 according to ..... which the payer himself is person responsible for paying without dragging the said matter into the labyrinth ..... assessee themselves who will have to be considered as persons responsible for paying the interest amount and not the actual individual .....

B.F. Goodrich Co. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Kolkata

Reported in: (1996)57ITD309(Kol.)

..... charge of running the concern and in that capacity are normally responsible for commission of tax offences escape prosecution similarly in the ..... in order to get at the persons who are really responsible for tax offences we recommend that the definition of principal ..... the working director similarly in the case of a partnership the responsibility to sign the return should rest on the managing partner .....