Response - Judgment Search Results

NitIn Kumar JaIn and Others Vs. District Judge, Mainpuri and Others

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: 2000(2)AWC1318

sudhir narain j 1 this writ petition is directed against the allotment order dated 19 9 1998 passed by rent...

Nema Ram Jakhar Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: 2001(1)WLC538; 2001(1)WLN461

..... by this court in mohan lal supra and the state is fully aware of its responsibility for providing basic education the posts had been advertised in the local newspaper having very .....

Tarit Ranjan Das Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Guwahati

..... fifth central pay commission recommendations the factors like similarity of job contents status and responsibilities were not similar to that of the applicant there existed difference between the applicant ..... department with the director general as its head the director general has the overall responsibility of planning and programming the senior level officers of different streams assist the director .....

Skanska International Civil Engineering Ab and anr. Vs. West Bengal St ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: (2001)2CALLT133(HC)

..... iii whose rectification would affect unfairly the competitive position of other bidders presenting substantially responsive bids iv which is incomplete or does not include all the works covered by ..... the petitioner all the time was interested in and did everything necessary for submitting responsive tender the petitioner has submitted pre tender earnest money and on deliberation appropriate officials .....

Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax and ors. Vs. Om Prakash Gattani

Court: Guwahati

..... to prize money of lotteries it is evident that the person responsible to make the payment to the assessee is under the statutory ..... whose income tax has been deducted at source but the person responsible to deduct the tax fails to deposit the same in the ..... be exposed to a great vulnerable position if some unscrupulous persons responsible to deduct the tax at source after deducting the amount do .....

United States Vs. Hubbell

Court: US Supreme Court

..... before the grand jury and invoked his fifth amendment privilege against self incrimination in response to questioning by the prosecutor respondent initially refused to state whether there are documents ..... evidence that constitutional privilege has the same application to the testimonial aspect of a response to a subpoena seeking discovery of those sources before the district court the government .....

Fda Vs. Brown and Williamson Tobacco Corp.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... s health effects and addictiveness the department s view was that congress has assumed the responsibility of regulating cigarettes smoking prevention and education act hearings on s 772 before the ..... to itself 1983 senate hearings 56 statement of assistant secretary brandt congress has assumed the responsibility of regulating cigarettes brief for appellee in action on smoking and health v harris .....

Rice Vs. Cayetano

Court: US Supreme Court

..... has charged aha with the mission of s erving as the principal public agency responsible for the performance development and coordination of programs and activities relating to native hawaiians ..... have established in a series of cases congress may fulfill its treaty obligations and its responsibilities to the indian tribes by enacting legislation dedicated to their circumstances and needs see .....

R. Kannan Vs. Kotak Mahindra Finance Ltd.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: [2003]115CompCas321(Mad)

..... as the general manager finance of the first accused company are responsible for the failure to make payment of the sums claimed ..... held it was specifically mentioned in the complaint that they were responsible for the non payment of the cheque amount after receipt of ..... and the averments referring to their position and that they are responsible for failure to make payment of sums claimed under the notice .....

Ashok Muthanna Managing Director M/S Fidelity Industries Ltd. and 3 Ot ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 2001(1)ALT(Cri)498; [2001]105CompCas203(Madras)

..... signatory therefore other accused namely these petitioners cannot be held responsible for the offence under section 138 of the act 3 ..... the prosecution establishes the requisite condition that the partner was responsible for carrying on the business during the relevant time the ..... directors or partners of the company are incharge or and responsible to the company for the conduct of the business of .....