Respondent - Judgment Search Results
Appellant Vs. Respondent
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Dec-02-2014
and be proceeded with accordingly. For the balance claim the parties are relegated the suit subject to the respondent disposing the balance sum with the Registrar Original Side, by September 15, 2014. In case the above sum
Appellant Vs. Respondent
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Nov-25-2014
and on completion of investigation charge-sheet under Sections 364/201/302 of the Indian Penal Code was submitted against the accused Archana Mondal. Accordingly trial started and after completion of trial the learned Sessions Judge, 3rd Court Malda convicted
Appellant Vs. Respondent
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: May-04-2016
Purushottam Dass Bangur For the Petitioner : Mr.S.K. Kapoor, Sr.Advocate Mr.P.K Jhunjhunwala, Advocate Mr.Ravi Kapoor, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr.Mr.Mr.Mr.Hearing concluded on : April 20, 2016 Judgment on : May 4, 2016 S.P.Sarkar, Sr.Advocate Debajyoti Datta,
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Appellant Vs. Respondent
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Aug-12-2016
Kumar Tiwari -Vs.- The State of West Bengal & ORS.For the petitioner : Mr.Sunil Kumar Chakraborty For the Respondent Nos.4, 6 & 7 : Mr.Kishore Dutta Mr.T.M.Siddiqui Mr.S.Siddiqui Mr.Azim Md.Sabir For the Respondent Nos.2 & 3 :
Appellant Vs. Respondent
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Sep-14-2016
Limited For the Appellant / Defendant : Mr.Abhrajit Mitra, Sr.Advocate, Mr.Abhijit Gangopadhyay, Advocate, Ms.Supriya Dubey, Advocate. For the Respondent / Plaintiff : Mr.Utpal Bose, Sr.Advocate, Mr.Ashis Kr. Mukherjee, Advocate, Mr.Sushil Kr. Sewak, Advocate. Hearing is concluded on
Appellant Vs. Respondent
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Nov-21-2016
Mr Mr Mr J.Chowdhury, Adv., M. S. Tiwari, Adv., S. K. Tiwari, Adv., R. Das, Adv. For the Respondents: Mr Surojit Nath Mitra, Sr Adv., Mr Sakya Sen, Adv., Ms Sanchari Chakraborty, Adv. Hearing concluded on: November
Appellant Vs. Respondent
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Mar-10-2017
during the occasion would create constraints in the process of administration of justice.”. In this reported case the respondent/defendant attempted to explain the background of the prior relationship between the parties and to establish that the appellant/plaintiff
Appellant Vs. Respondent
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Apr-12-2017
Rakesh Tiwari, J.AND The Hon’ble Mir Dara Sheko, J.For the appellant : Mr. Sutirtha Das, Advocate For the respondent : Mr. Arindam Moitra, Advocate Heard on :07. 02.2017 Judgment on :12. 04.2017 Delivered by Hon’ble Justice Rakesh
Appellant Vs. Respondent
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: May-17-2017
the petitioners : Mr. Sibaji Sen, Advocate, Mr. Dipankar More, Advocate, Mr. Raj Kumar Gupta, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Pradyumna Sinha, Advocate. Mr. Tapas Saha, Advocate. Heard on: February 17, March 17, and April 7,
Petitioner Vs. Respondent
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-14-2012
the suit, this application came to be filed. In that application, on 20.04.2012 this court found that the respondents have not filed any counter. This court had recorded the oral statement of the counsel for the respondents
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free