Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Respond - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial to open GPT-powered briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results - plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 05 2013

.....Respondents Vs. State of Punjab and Others

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Aug-05-2013

Advocate for the petitioneRs.Ms.Amarjit Kaur Khurana, Addl. A.G., Punjab for respondents No.1 to 3. None for respondents No.4 and 5. T.P.S.MANN,


Jul 22 2013

.....Respondents Vs. State of Haryana and Others

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Jul-22-2013

Advocate for the petitioner. Ms.Priyanka Dalal, Asstt. A.G., Haryana for respondent No.1-State. T.P.S.MANN, J.(Oral) The petitioner is aggrieved of the remarks


Jan 17 2013

idrish Vs. --respondents

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Jan-17-2013

Advocate, for the petitioner Mr.B.S.Rana, Addl.A.G, Punjab Mr.Sanjay Chauhan,Advocate, for respondent Nos.2 and 3. A.K.SIKRI, CJ.(Oral) Municipal Committee, Ferozepur, Jhirka, conducted


Turn these results into brief-ready notes

Jul 16 2013

.....Respondents Vs. State of Punjab and Another

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Jul-16-2013

for the petitioner. Mr.Gurinderjit Singh, Deputy Advocate General, Pb for respondent No.1. Mr.A.K.Walia, Advocate for respondent No.2. T.P.S.MANN, J.(Oral) The petitioner,


Nov 26 2012

.....Respondents Vs. State of Haryana Through Collector Yamuna Nagar a ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Nov-26-2012

RFA No.2666 of 2001 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RFA No.2666...


Nov 01 2016

Petitioner Vs. Respondents

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Nov-01-2016

and water supply running through the portion owned by the respondents has been cut followed by an encroachment in the common


Nov 24 2016

Petitioner Vs. Respondents

Court: Chennai Madurai

Decided on: Nov-24-2016

1. This Petition is filed to amend the suit number in para 6 of the order passed in the above...


Nov 25 2016

Pettioner Vs. Respondents

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Nov-25-2016

1. Based on the note dated 29.08.2016 prepared by the Registry, the matter came to be placed before this Bench,...


Nov 04 2016

Petitioner Vs. Respondents

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Nov-04-2016

T.S. Sivagnanam, J. 1. Reference may be made to the earlier order dated 01.09.2016. It is heartening to note that...


Aug 19 2016

Petitioner Vs. Respondents

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Aug-19-2016

following reliefs: (i) Pass an order of injunction restraining the respondents from taking any steps pursuant to the Master Rental and


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

Try AI Brief & Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial