Respond - Judgment Search Results
.....Respondents Vs. State of Punjab and Others
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Aug-05-2013
Advocate for the petitioneRs.Ms.Amarjit Kaur Khurana, Addl. A.G., Punjab for respondents No.1 to 3. None for respondents No.4 and 5. T.P.S.MANN,
.....Respondents Vs. State of Haryana and Others
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jul-22-2013
Advocate for the petitioner. Ms.Priyanka Dalal, Asstt. A.G., Haryana for respondent No.1-State. T.P.S.MANN, J.(Oral) The petitioner is aggrieved of the remarks
idrish Vs. --respondents
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jan-17-2013
Advocate, for the petitioner Mr.B.S.Rana, Addl.A.G, Punjab Mr.Sanjay Chauhan,Advocate, for respondent Nos.2 and 3. A.K.SIKRI, CJ.(Oral) Municipal Committee, Ferozepur, Jhirka, conducted
Turn these results into brief-ready notes
.....Respondents Vs. State of Punjab and Another
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jul-16-2013
for the petitioner. Mr.Gurinderjit Singh, Deputy Advocate General, Pb for respondent No.1. Mr.A.K.Walia, Advocate for respondent No.2. T.P.S.MANN, J.(Oral) The petitioner,
.....Respondents Vs. State of Haryana Through Collector Yamuna Nagar a ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Nov-26-2012
RFA No.2666 of 2001 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RFA No.2666...
Petitioner Vs. Respondents
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-01-2016
and water supply running through the portion owned by the respondents has been cut followed by an encroachment in the common
Petitioner Vs. Respondents
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Nov-24-2016
1. This Petition is filed to amend the suit number in para 6 of the order passed in the above...
Pettioner Vs. Respondents
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-25-2016
1. Based on the note dated 29.08.2016 prepared by the Registry, the matter came to be placed before this Bench,...
Petitioner Vs. Respondents
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-04-2016
T.S. Sivagnanam, J. 1. Reference may be made to the earlier order dated 01.09.2016. It is heartening to note that...
Petitioner Vs. Respondents
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-19-2016
following reliefs: (i) Pass an order of injunction restraining the respondents from taking any steps pursuant to the Master Rental and
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Try AI Brief & Semantic Search - 7 days free