Skip to content


Respective - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: respective Year: 2001 Page 1 of about 304 results (0.104 seconds)
May 25 2001 (HC)

Aruna Gupta Vs. Ranbir Singh Dhanjal

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: May-25-2001

Reported in: I(2002)DMC254

..... opd11 relief 4 parties led oral as well as documentary evidence in support of their respective cases issues no 1 to 6 8 and 9 were taken up together by the ..... enjoys the benefit thereof the latter is bound to make compensation to the former in respect of or to restore the thing so done or delivered the benefit of this section .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 29 2001 (FN)

Buckhannon Board and Care Home, Inc. Vs. West Virginia Dept. of Health ...

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: May-29-2001

..... dove and andrew h baida assistant attorneys general and by the attorneys general for their respective states as follows bill pryor of alabama bill lockyer of california ken salazar of colorado .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 05 2001 (HC)

Purna Chandra Patra Vs. Dasharath Patra and anr.

Court: Orissa

Decided on: Nov-05-2001

Reported in: 2002(I)OLR363

..... facie case because of absence of an eye witness in that respect as noted above learned sessions judge also followed the path ..... properly followed to arrive at the right conclusion failure in that respect shall result in miscarriage of justice and defeat the purpose ..... followed to arrive at the right conclusion failure in that respect shall result in miscarriage of justice and defeat the purpose .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 17 2001 (HC)

Friends Coal Carbonisation Vs. Hindustan Zinc Ltd.

Court: Rajasthan

Decided on: Aug-17-2001

Reported in: AIR2002Raj116; 2002(4)WLC707; 2002(2)WLN96

..... it clear that the dispute referred to the arbitrators was with respect to the interpretation of the price escalation clause and the ..... the finding recorded on this point by the arbitrators was wish respect to the dispute referred to the arbitrators and both the ..... the arbitrators on this point 38 the next point was with respect to the price variation for which the representatives of the respondent .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 25 2001 (TRI)

Commissioner of Central Excise, Vs. M/S. Nahar Fibres Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: May-25-2001

..... filed this appeal against the order in appeal where the benefit of modvat credit in respect of distribution board and panels are allowed the respondents vide letter dated 13 3 2001 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 25 2001 (TRI)

Deco Mica Limited Vs. Commissioner of Customs and

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: May-25-2001

..... the counsel for the applicant that penalty under section 11ac could not be invoked with respect to credit taken before its enactment in september 1996 prima facie has to be accepted .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 25 2001 (TRI)

M/S S.A.i.L. Vs. C.C.E., Bbsr

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta

Decided on: May-25-2001

..... own case the tribunal has upheld the availability of notification no 217 86 ce in respect of reming mass itself therefore we do not find it necessary to remand the matter .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 25 2001 (TRI)

M/S. Steel Authority of India Ltd. Vs. C.C.E., Bhubaneswar

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta

Decided on: May-25-2001

..... year and for the difference between the sectional weight and actual weight 5 similarly in respect of allegation of clandestine removal of slab appellant had explained that the differences is attributable .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 25 2001 (TRI)

Commissioner of Central Excise, Vs. M/S. Assam Polyester

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta

Decided on: May-25-2001

..... 11ac in the act cannot be the subject matter of penalty under the said provisions respectfully following the ratio of the apex court s judgment we hold that neither penalty was .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 25 2001 (TRI)

M/S. Forbes Gokak Ltd. Vs. Commr. of Customs, Calcutta

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta

Decided on: May-25-2001

Reported in: (2001)(137)ELT360Tri(Kol.)kata

..... the containers had already been shipped out was pleaded before him but the evidence in respect of the same was placed subsequent on the same day as is evident from the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //