Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Respective - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 13 2003

In Respect of Shri Ravinder Pal Singh Sidhu, Chairman, Punjab Public S ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Jan-13-2003

Reported in: AIR2003SC788; 2003(1)AWC653(SC); 95(2003)CLT473(SC); [2003(96)FLR682]; JT2003(1)SC101; 2003(1)SCALE115; (2003)2SCC147; [2003]1SCR91; 2003(1)LC302(SC)

Acts/Rules/Orders: Constitution of India - Articles 145, 316, 316(2), 317, 317(1) and 318Cases Referred: Union of India and Ors. v. Gopal Chandra Misra and Ors., Citing Reference: Union of India and Ors. v. Gopal Chandra Misra...


Jul 16 2013

“after Hearing Respective Contentions of Both Vs.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Jul-16-2013

dated 05.07.2011 (Annexure P-6).The Court of Revision while dismissing the revision petition has observed as under:- “After hearing respective contentions of both the sides and also having gone through the record carefully it is found that the


Jan 21 2013

“with Due Respect It Is Stated That the Mother of the Applicant Is I ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Jan-21-2013

inquiry leading to dismissal from service was made through letter dated 2.3.2000 which reads as follows: “With due respect it is stated that the mother of the applicant is ill and she is getting treatment from S.R.Hospital,


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 09 2014

Respectively on the Premise That their Residential Vs. Smt.Murti Devi ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Jan-09-2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.90 of 2014 Date of Decision: January 09, 2014 Smt.Murti Devi and others .....Petitioners versus State of Haryana and others .....Respondents CORAM :...


Jan 27 2014

“with Due Respect It Is Submitted That I Have Received Vs. State of ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Jan-27-2014

order dated 01.10.2013, the affected parties were directed to appear before the learned Court below to get their respective statements recorded with regard to the compromise. The said Court was also directed to send a detailed report


Apr 08 1987

Periyar Self-respect Propaganda Institution, Trichy and ors. Vs. State ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Apr-08-1987

Reported in: AIR1988Mad27

shall be deemed so far as the Same are Consistent with the provisions so re-enacted, to have been respectively published. issued, conferred. prescribed, defined, established, made, entered into, granted or done under the provisions so reenacted.'Tamil Nadu


Nov 13 1969

The Self-respect Sangam, Erode by President, E.V. Ramaswami Naicker Vs ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Nov-13-1969

Reported in: (1970)1MLJ367

memo.The parties are agreeable to a remand, and the principles of the Indian Partition Act are applied in respect of the property.2. On the basis of this endorsement the matter was remanded again to the trial Court


Apr 13 2006

K. Rajamanickam (D) and anr. Vs. Periyar Self Respect Propaganda Insti ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Apr-13-2006

Reported in: AIR2007Mad25

of the Central Act and the State Act, harmoniously so that both are able to survive in the respective fields and also able to achieve their respective objectives. No doubt, Section 14(6) of NCTE Act says that


Aug 20 2013

Chatur Bhuj Pandey @ Pappu Pandey Vs. Respective Statements with Regar ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Aug-20-2013

affected parties were directed to appear on 08.05.2013, before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gurgaon, for getting their respective statements recorded with regard to the compromise. The said Court also directed to send a detailed report in


Feb 13 2014

Present:- Mr. Chetan Mittal Sr. Advocate with Vs. their Respective Rig ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Feb-13-2014

15 days from today, which shall be paid and received by both the parties without prejudice to their respective rights. Respondent No.2 is further directed to keep on paying a lump-sum amount of Rs.1 lacs per month


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial