Skip to content


Respective - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: respective Year: 2000 Page 1 of about 302 results (0.092 seconds)
Feb 03 2000 (HC)

Brijendra Kumar Gupta and Others Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Feb-03-2000

Reported in: 2000(1)AWC750

..... already commenced or pending in any court of law which has hitherto exercised jurisdiction in respect of said areas 2 2 the document appended as annexure la reads thus from sri ..... of 1999 3473 of 1999 2572 of 1999 4998 of 1999 and 5002 of 1999 respectively xvi under similarcircumstances creation of anew district sant kabirnagar was successfullychallenged before this courtin civil .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 20 2000 (HC)

Mani Vs. Batcha Sahib and 2 Others

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Sep-20-2000

Reported in: 2000(4)CTC329

..... the counsel would cite several authorities in support of their respective pleas 9 before going into the questions involved in this ..... was never executed but he executed a release deed in respect of the transaction which he had with one dhivyanathan and ..... 104 of indian evidence act 1872 plaintiff demanded specific relief in respect of sale agreement first and second defendants contested suit denying .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 02 2000 (TRI)

Gabriel India Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Nov-02-2000

Reported in: (2001)(127)ELT298TriDel

..... in the case of gujarat electricity board relied upon by the learned dr was in respect of registered letter which was returned with the postal endorsement that the addressee refused to .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 01 2000 (TRI)

R.R. Electronics Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Nov-01-2000

Reported in: (2001)(73)ECC143

..... through ahmedabad airport thus the notice itself issued by the officer subordinate to him in respect of imports outside the jurisdiction cannot be maintained 8 the department representative s contention is .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 01 2000 (TRI)

Sambaswa Allied Industries and Vs. Cce

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Hyderabad

Decided on: Nov-01-2000

Reported in: (2001)(94)LC450Tri(Hyd.)erabad

..... together for disposal by this common order as per law 2 commissioner appeals vide his respective orders in appeal has dismissed the appeals under section 35f of the ce act 1944 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 30 2000 (TRI)

Mahalaxmi Glass Works Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Oct-30-2000

Reported in: (2001)(73)ECC302

..... information of such manufacturers on these bottles sold the bottles to the beverage manufacturers the respective jurisdictional collectors issued notices in 1988 to mahalaxmi and wig proposing that in view of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 30 2000 (TRI)

Commissioner of C. Ex Vs. K.C. Bearing (P) Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Oct-30-2000

Reported in: (2001)(127)ELT168TriDel

1 the common issue involved in these appeals is in respect of classification of integral shaft bearings or water pump bearings therefore these appeals are being .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 27 2000 (TRI)

Indian Petrochem. Corpn. Ltd. Vs. Commr. of C. Ex. and Cus.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Oct-27-2000

Reported in: (2001)(73)ECC295

..... were stated by it to be intended to be manufactured out of raw naphtha in respect of which the concession was sought of which carbon black feedstock was the first a .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 25 2000 (TRI)

Ujjaval Unique Tech. P. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Oct-25-2000

Reported in: (2001)(127)ELT230TriDel

..... for chapter 90 line or radio transmitters and receivers for telemetering pulses remain in their respective headings heading 85 17 85 25 or 85 27 as the case may be in .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 24 2000 (TRI)

Garware Marine Inds. Ltd. Vs. Commr. of C. Ex. and Cus.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Oct-24-2000

Reported in: (2001)(127)ELT734Tri(Mum.)bai

..... tested in the laboratory the results showed higher denierage that is 486 and 703 2 respectively the retest of the samples confirmed the findings however a separate sample sent by the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //