Res Get - Judgment Search Results
Mangalchand Mohanlal Vs. Re.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Dec-20-1951
Reported in: [1952]21ITR164(All)
found by the Tribunal Dina Nath and Amarnath as the respective members of Ram Bharosey and Ram Sarups branches could represent
L. H. Sugar Factories and Oil Mills Ltd. Vs. Re.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Dec-20-1951
Reported in: [1952]21ITR325(All)
of to Section 10(2)(v). Section 10(2)(v) is as follows :-'In respect of current repairs of such buildings, machinery, plant or furniture, … in the nature of repairs they were not intended to get a deduction in the name of depreciation in respect of
Chaturbhuj and Co. Vs. Re.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Apr-07-1959
Reported in: [1960]39ITR337(All)
been only the excess profits tax which was avoided in respect of the chargeable accounting period in question namely Rs. 2,947-5-0
Turn these results into brief-ready notes
Hindustan Commercial Bank Ltd. Vs. Re.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jan-08-1952
Reported in: [1952]21ITR353(All)
facts of the case, the sum of Rs. 89,870 in respect of expenses incurred in opening offices of the bank was … which are not of lasting value and are likely to get exhausted or consumed in the process of the return or
Ram Kumar Ramniwas of Nanpara Vs. Re.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Aug-29-1952
Reported in: [1952]22ITR474(All)
a partnership. It is difficult to understand how such a result can be derived from the decision in Lachhman Dass case … he may bind other coparceners who would be entitled to get the benefits of the partnership and whose share in the
Udayram Jagannath Vs. Re.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Oct-05-1950
Reported in: [1951]19ITR222(All)
Court went to the length of holding that any other result would be unthinkable. See G. M. Madappa v. Commissioner of
Lalli Ram Sunderlal Jhansi Vs. Re.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Oct-04-1950
Reported in: [1951]19ITR372(All)
this provision under which party No. 2 was not to get any share in the profits for a number of years,
Kishan Parshad and Co., Ltd., Ambala Vs. Re.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jun-18-1951
Reported in: [1952]21ITR303(P& H)
shares and an injunction had been issued by the Court restraining the assessee company from selling their remaining shares. When the
Lala Lachhman Dass Nayar and Others Vs. Re.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Sep-15-1952
Reported in: [1952]22ITR418(P& H)
constituted except for the year 1941-42. Later on as a result of proceedings being taken under Section 34 of the income-tax
The Central Talkies Circuit, Matunga, Vs. Re.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Oct-07-1940
Reported in: [1941]9ITR44(Bom)
the amendment of Section 16(3) of the Income-tax Act, in respect of the shares standing in the names of a wife … deed dated July 14, 1937 as the motive was to get round the Amendment. That was wrong. The motives of a
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Try AI Brief & Semantic Search - 7 days free