Skip to content


Res - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: res Page 1 of about 6,614 results (0.033 seconds)
Sep 15 1952 (HC)

Lala Lachhman Dass Nayar and Others Vs. Re.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: [1952]22ITR418(P& H)

on the orders passed. In reply to this part the respondents submit that the action taken is legal and that no

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 20 1937 (PC)

North British and Mercantile Insurance Co. Vs. Re.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: [1937]5ITR349(Cal)

in the section, no tax is to be levied in respect of the interest upon them. To say, as has been

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 30 1942 (PC)

Messrs. Govindram Seksaria Vs. Re.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: [1943]11ITR104(Bom)

agents did not dispute their liability to be assessed in respect of the year 1935-36. They were actually assessed, and they

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 20 1951 (HC)

L. H. Sugar Factories and Oil Mills Ltd. Vs. Re.

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: [1952]21ITR325(All)

to get a deduction in the name of depreciation in respect of the same permanent structure. Sri Das, on behalf of

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 24 1940 (PC)

Indian National Tannery Vs. Re.

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: [1941]9ITR618(All)

Mohammad Hamza, Mohammad Nazir and Mohammad Bashir, as follows :-(1) Reserve FundRs. 35,000(2) Mohammad Hamza' 52,388(3) Mohammad Nazir' 10,278(4) Mohammad Bashir'

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 07 1940 (PC)

The Central Talkies Circuit, Matunga, Vs. Re.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: [1941]9ITR44(Bom)

the amendment of Section 16(3) of the Income-tax Act, in respect of the shares standing in the names of a wife

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 18 1942 (PC)

Messrs. Hiralal Kalyanmal and Another Vs. Re.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: [1943]11ITR128(Bom)

they have been assessed, and the same is paid. In respect of the sales effected at the Indore shop the facts

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 19 1941 (PC)

Mangniram Bangor and Co., Vs. Re.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: [1941]9ITR573(Cal)

might thereafter become due and payable to the mortgagors in respect of the prospecting and mining leases which the mortgagors had

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 27 1937 (PC)

Dwarakanath Harischandra Pitale and Another Vs. Re.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: [1937]5ITR716(Bom)

?'The facts found are that the assessees became entitled as residuary legatees under the will of their grand-fathers to certain house

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 18 1941 (PC)

K. Habibulla Vs. Re.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: [1941]9ITR292(Cal)

was the manager appointed by the Court of Wards in respect of the whole or part of the other nine annas

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //