Requisition - Judgment Search Results
Smt. Prabhavati Jagannath Thakar (Since Deceased Through Her Heirs and ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jan-14-2008
Reported in: 2008(2)ALLMR749; 2008(2)BomCR616; (2008)110BOMLR504; 2008(4)MhLj504
in the event the respondent No.6 does not require the lands for the purpose for which they were requisitioned initially, the lands should be derequisitioned and handed over to the petitioners. 2. The aforesaid lands were owned
Amiya Gopal Hazra and ors. Vs. 2nd Land Requisition Collector and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Dec-20-1963
Reported in: AIR1964Cal587
of the Seventh Schedule had been amended so that at the relevant time Item 42 read: 'Acquisition and requisitioning of property'. With this amendment in the Constitution, all limits and letters on the State legislature's powers to
President, Association of Allottees of Requisition Premises, Bombay Vs ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-23-1986
Reported in: 1986(1)SCALE1190; 1986Supp(1)SCC567
with a positive scheme for the purpose of housing of Govt. servants who are in occupation of the requisitioned premises. In those cases when the requisitioning was made more than 30 years ago, the State Govt. must
18-section briefs on any result in this list
“that the Petitioner Has Never Applied for Requisite Change of Vs. D ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Dec-04-2012
It is stated as under :- CWP No.4349 of 2012 -2- “That the petitioner has never applied for requisite Change of Land use permission as per the provisions of Rule-26A of Punjab Scheduled Roads & Controlled Areas
“2) Thus the Pre-requisite for Treating Any Person as Employee Under ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-20-2013
CWP No.14725 of 2011 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ***** CWP No.14725 of 2011 DATE OF DECISION :20.5.2013 Inductis (India) Private Limited ....Petitioner Versus Employees Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal and...
Trial Court Records Were Also Requisitioned. on 18.07.2013 It Vs. Smt. ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Apr-22-2014
appellant filed the present appeal. Notice of motion was issued on 05.03.2013. The trial Court records were also requisitioned. On 18.07.2013 it Amit Kaundal 2014.04.28 13:48 was ordered that the appellant shall pay Rs.15,000/- as I attest
Gillapukri Tea and Seed Co. Ltd. and ors. Vs. Additional Director of L ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Nov-09-1981
Reported in: AIR1982Cal220,86CWN210
Matched in: Parties Gillapukri Tea and Seed Co. Ltd. and ors. Vs. Additional Director of Land Requisition and Acquisition and Reforms, Assam and ors.
Chayarani Mukherjee Vs. Assistant Secretary to the Government of W. Be ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Mar-26-1964
Reported in: AIR1964Cal428,68CWN826
executed, the State Government passed an order on November 2, under Section 3(1) of the West Bengal Premises Requisition and Control (Temporary Provisions) Act, 1947 (W. B. Act V of 1947) requisitioning the premises and directing the
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free