Request - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: request Year: 1976 Page 1 of about 576 results (0.186 seconds)Kamalabai and ors. Vs. the State of Maharashtra and ors.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Aug-19-1976
Reported in: AIR1978Bom26; (1977)79BOMLR370; ILR1977Bom2459; 1977MhLJ450
passed by the maharashtra revenue tribunal au rangabad dismissing an appeal against the decision of the surplus lands determination tribunal nilanga
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAteesee Vs. State of KeralA.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Dec-14-1976
Reported in: (1977)6CTR(SC)0067B
..... the i schedule to the central excises and salt act 1944 3 counsel for the petition contended that the words as defined in the central excise and salt act 1944 in .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBhanwar Lal Vs. U.i.T.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Feb-04-1976
Reported in: 1976WLN(UC)45
..... jurisdiction of this court in favour of the petitioner 10 with these observations the writ petition is dismissed summarily constitution of india article 226 alternative remedy dispossession by uit held civil ..... rights not to be adjudicated in writ petition the petitioner has already chosen ordinary remedy under law of filing a suit amp has .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBhanwarlal Sharma Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jan-21-1976
Reported in: 1976WLN(UC)43
..... the short question which requires consideration in this rather longish writ petition is as to whether the respondents nos 4 to 13 were erroneously ..... have already been set aside by the decision in the aforesaid writ petition and the respondent state has been restrained from giving effect to ..... set aside the very same orders again in the present writ petition 3 so far as respondent no 5 is concerned the reply .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTG.N. Bhargava Vs. the State of Rajasthan and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jan-21-1976
Reported in: 1976WLN(UC)31
..... the aforesaid office 2 the facts which give rise to this writ petition lie in a very narrow compass the petitioner is an assistant engineer ..... to as the rules 3 the respondent state has contested the writ petition and it has been submitted on its behalf that the respondent no ..... id red by this court 7 in the aforesaid circumstances the writ petition is allowed and the respondent no 2 is directed to be .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRamkishore Vs. Jagdish Prasad and anr.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jan-13-1976
Reported in: 1976WLN(UC)25
..... the returned candidate has been materially affected b rajasthan municipalities act 1959 section 34 election petition non reception of challenged votes petitioner to prove that result of election h is been ..... challenged votes at the time of counting c rajasthan municipalities act 1959 section 34 election petition election result materially affected held court to see proof amp not possibilities in my .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAdhikarla Ananda Rao Vs. S. Gurmel Singh and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-14-1976
Reported in: 13(1977)DLT48; 1977RLR97
..... march 1972 according to the landlord the respondent in the present petition the petitioner shifted to the ground floor by way of an ..... the matter was still sub judice in this court in a petition of revision the additional rent controller further appears to have completely ..... applicant resorted to this hon ble court with the present writ petition under article 227 of the constitution as follows 1 while .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTLachman Singh and anr. Vs. the Statesman Ltd. and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-24-1976
Reported in: ILR1977Delhi450
..... repudiated the employees filed a suit out of which the present petition has arisen seeking to enforce the aforesaid agreement and sought from ..... below confirmed the trial court s order in the instant revision petition filed by the petitioners against that order it was held as ..... a farce the impugned orders were accordingly set aside 1 this petition under section 115 of the code of civil procedure by two .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKrishan Lal Gupta Vs. Dujodwala Industries and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-19-1976
Reported in: ILR1976Delhi442
can object to the question asked by the court the plea that the opposite party has not yet been examined cannot
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMurarilal Sarawagi Etc. Etc. Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Dec-15-1976
Reported in: (1977)6CTR(SC)95
court also considered only one contract in the special leave petition the appellants assailed the assumption made by the high court
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial