Request - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: request Year: 1966 Page 1 of about 572 results (0.264 seconds)The Lokamanya Mills Barsi Limited Vs. Barsi Municipal Council, Barsi a ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Nov-22-1966
Reported in: AIR1968Bom229; (1967)69BOMLR656
..... facts leading to special civil application no 1476 of 1966 that petition has been filed by the lokmanya mills of barsi against the ..... this judgment special civil application no 1424 of 1966 is a petition under article 226 of the constitution filed by rajen textile mills ..... 1966 40 nothing more is required to be decided in this petition it is declared that the provisions of the impugned act mentioned .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNavinchandra Babubhai Nagarsheth and ors. Vs. Bombay Revenue Tribunal ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jan-21-1966
Reported in: [1966]3SCR412
is not disputed by either set of parties to the appeal no compensation is expressly provided for the loss of the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe State of Bihar Vs. Rambalak Singh and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jan-17-1966
Reported in: AIR1966SC1441; 1966(0)BLJR595; 1966CriLJ1076; [1966]3SCR344
..... the case after the dismissal of the revision petition appellant filed a criminal miscellaneous petition requesting the high court to exercise its powers ..... on bail pending the final disposal of the said habeas corpus petition 2 the learned advocate general stated at the outset that ..... to pass the release order when it deals with habeas corpus petition under article 226 of the constitution but it can do .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState of Gujarat Vs. Jaganbhai Bhagwanbhai
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Feb-16-1966
Reported in: AIR1966SC1633; 1966CriLJ1227; (1966)0GLR800; [1966]3SCR613
years and iii that there is no chance of his appeal being heard within a period of seven years these circumstances
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income-tax, Madras Vs. Prithvi Insurance Co. Ltd.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Oct-26-1966
Reported in: AIR1967SC853; [1967]63ITR632(SC); [1967]1SCR943
are dismissed with costs one hearing fee g c 17 appeal dismissed the case debated on whether decision of the high
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRam Kumar Agarwalla and Brothers Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Centr ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Oct-26-1966
Reported in: AIR1967SC921; [1967]63ITR622(SC); [1967]1SCR955
arijit pasayat asok kumar ganguly jj offence of food adulteration plea by accused that warrant procedure was adopted was raised for
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTParekh Wadilal Jivanbhai Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Madhya Prades ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Oct-28-1966
Reported in: AIR1967SC448; [1967]63ITR485(SC); 1967MhLJ654(SC); [1967]1SCR998
but the appeal was dismissed the assessee preferred a second appeal to the appellate tribunal but that appeal also was dismissed
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTC.P. Sarathy Mudaliar Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Andhra Pradesh
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-21-1966
Reported in: [1966]62ITR576(SC)
be no order as to costs in these appeals 8 appeal allowed case remanded direct taxation advisory jurisdiction sections 66 and
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTincome-tax Officer, Alleppey Vs. S. Veeriah Reddiar
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Oct-10-1966
Reported in: [1967]64ITR70(SC)
..... 1961 the respondent challenged the validity of that notice by a petition under article 226 of the constitution before the kerala high court ..... a ground which was not raised by the respondent in his petition under article 226 of the constitution this submission has to be ..... question were not brought out by the respondent in his writ petition or the affidavit filed in support of it consequently this new .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRanjit Singh Vs. Pritam Singh and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Feb-08-1966
Reported in: AIR1966SC1626; [1966]3SCR543
..... but lost in the election thereupon he filed an election petition against the appellant challenging his election on a number of ..... the main contention of respondent pritam singh in the election petition was that the returning officer was wrong in not looking ..... appeal therefore succeeds and is hereby allowed with costs the election petition is dismissed pritam singh respondent will pay the costs 14 .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT