Request - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: request Year: 1926 Page 1 of about 561 results (0.109 seconds)Munshi Safar Ali Vs. Khosh Banu (Koshban in Petition) on His Death Her ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Dec-02-1926
Reported in: 100Ind.Cas.614
defend the suit in respect of the plot or to appeal in the matter 9 in this view i consider that
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCollector of Satara Vs. Mahadu Raghu Kadam
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jul-02-1926
Reported in: AIR1926Bom582
fawcett j 1 the point that has been referred to us by the subordinate judge is whether in view of...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTEmperor Vs. Chunilal Hargovan
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jun-03-1926
Reported in: (1926)28BOMLR1023
provisions of section 412 criminal procedure code i think this plea can be raised although the applicant pleaded guilty the contention
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHarendra Kumar Ghosh Vs. Emperor
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: May-03-1926
Reported in: AIR1927Cal409,101Ind.Cas.597
1 the rule was obtained by the petitioner harendra kumar ghosh who was the tax daroga and cashier of mymensingh...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMullapudi Satya Narayana Brahmam and ors. Vs. Maganti Seethayya
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-29-1926
Reported in: AIR1927Mad597; 100Ind.Cas.776; (1927)52MLJ396
unwilling to retain tax wrongly collected by relying on the plea of limitation the subordinate judge relies on nrityamoni dasi v
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNarayan Nanajee Gayadhani and ors. Vs. Ganesh Trimbak Gayadhani
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jan-25-1926
Reported in: AIR1926Bom599
lordship after dealing with other matters concluded by dismissing the appeal and the cross objections madgavkar j 7 after dealing with
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNarayan Putapa Chandragatgi and ors. Vs. Vaikunt Subaya Sonde
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Aug-09-1926
Reported in: AIR1927Bom1
the practice pointed out in jagarnath sahi v that an appeal does lie in a case like the present on a
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSripad Vishnu Pandit Vs. Secretary of State for India
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Apr-09-1926
Reported in: AIR1926Bom581
we think then that the decision was right and the appeal must be dismissed with costs indian evidence act 1872 section
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBasaya Nurndaya Dhandvati and ors. Vs. Murgaya Somaya JangIn and ors.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jun-07-1926
Reported in: AIR1926Bom576
1 two points have been urged in support of this appeal the first point is that the meeting of the municipality
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Ahmedabad Cotton and C. Co. Vs. Bai Budhian Rajaram
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Dec-17-1926
Reported in: (1927)29BOMLR349; 101Ind.Cas.552
confirm the decree of the lower court and dismiss this appeal with costs workmen s compensation act viii of 1923 section
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial