Reputation - Judgment Search Results
Repute Land and Leasing Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-07-2015
OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:07. 07.2015 W.P. (C) 2465/2015 & CM No.4428/2015 (stay) REPUTE LAND AND LEASING PVT. LTD. ... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ... Respondents Advocates who appeared
The State of Andhra Pradesh Vs. Repute Plastic Colours Ltd.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-23-2001
Reported in: [2002]125STC282(AP)
ORDERS.R. Nayak 1. The point that arises for decision is whether the cable sheathing compound manufactured by the respondent-dealer is an article of plastic falling under Entry No.186 of the First Schedule to the A.P.G.S.T. Act...
Shaw Wallace and Company Ltd. Vs. Repute Fertilizers and ors.
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Sep-19-1991
Reported in: (1992)2GLR1273
newspaper regarding attachment of Gokul Bungalow alleged to be belonging to the second respondent adversely affected the business reputation and the respondents have no business whatsoever and it is impossible for them to make any payment in
18-section briefs on any result in this list
R. Thangaperumal Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu Reputed by Its Commission ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-27-1988
Reported in: (1989)2MLJ239
ORDERBakthavatsalam, J.1. The petitioner is a Headmaster of the Government High School at Illayaresanandal, Sankarankoil taluk, Tirunelveli District. According to the entry in the S.S.L.C. book, his date of birth was 6.9.1929. The petitioner's case was...
The Vizagapatam Sugar Development Company Limited, by Its Reputed Secr ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-02-1923
Reported in: AIR1924Mad271; 76Ind.Cas.886; (1923)45MLJ528
1. The facts relevant to the answer of the question propounded to us in this case can be very briefly stated. The predecessor-in-title of the plaintiff, in return for the allotment to him of a number...
The Vizagapatam Sugar Development Co. Ltd., by Its Reputed Secretary, ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-12-1923
Reported in: 76Ind.Cas.894; (1923)45MLJ826
1. It is now contended by Mr. Naryanamurthi that the applicability of the doctrine of part performance is limited to cases where the right to sue for specific performance is not barred on the date of...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free