Reply - Judgment Search Results
“no Reply Has Been Filed. Vs. Udayvir and Another ........Applicants ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jul-22-2013
of the Limitation Act, for condonation of delay of 700 days in filing the appeal. To the application, reply has been filed. Heard counsel for the parties. The applicants are sons of Murari, who had filed CWP
Reply on Behalf of the Respondent - State Filed in Court Vs. State of ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Feb-17-2014
D.S. Malwai, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Gurvinder Singh Sidhu, AAG, Haryana. **** Dr.Bharat Bhushan Parsoon, J.(Oral) 1. Reply on behalf of the respondent - State filed in Court today, is taken on record.2. The petitioner, a
“a Short Reply by Way of an Affidavit Dated 22.04.2014 of Deputy Vs. ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-20-2014
Police Station Dharamgarh, District Sangrur. On 22.04.2014, the following order was passed by this Court :- “A short reply by way of an affidavit dated 22.04.2014 of Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sub Division, Dirba has been filed
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Reply by Way of Counter Affidavit of Kamlesh Kumari Vs. State of Punja ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-07-2014
Present :- Mr.S.P.S Tinna, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Anshul Gupta, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab. ****** Rajesh Bindal, J. Reply by way of counter affidavit of Kamlesh Kumari, Under Secretary, to Govt. of Punjab, Department of Rural Development
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free