Replacement - Year 2011 - Judgments

Mar 23 2011 (TRI)

Powergrid Corporation of India Limited, Haryana Vs. Central Electricit ...

Court: Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Decided on: Mar-23-2011

..... 2008 respectively disallowing the claim of the appellant regarding additional capitalization of the transformers replacing the damaged transformers 2 both these appeals are disposed of through this common ..... the appellant has claimed the difference between the cost of the new repaired transformer replacing the damaged transformer and the depreciated value of the damaged transformer as additional .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 15 2011 (TRI)

Authorised Representative, Seva Automotive Ltd. and Others Vs. Anil Ba ...

Court: Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Mumbai

Decided on: Nov-15-2011

..... condition consideration age is totally affected the part which is replaced are not replaced in short time or running upto 2 to 2 5 ..... defects which entitled the complainant respondent no 1 herein to seek replacement of the vehicle what is pertinent to note is the ..... redressal forum exceeded its jurisdiction in directing both the appellants to replace the car and to give a brand new car and alternatively .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 03 2011 (HC)

Ms Hrd Corporation Vs. Gail (India) Ltd.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Nov-03-2011

..... are applicable for the appointment of the arbitrator to be replaced therefore what section 15 2 contemplates is an appointment of ..... applicable to the appointment of the original arbitrator who was being replaced the term rules in section 15 2 obviously referred to ..... rules that were applicable to the appointment of the arbitrator being replaced the procedure for filling the vacancy arising out of the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 25 2011 (TRI)

The Branch Manager, Eureka Forbes Limited Vs. C. Govindan

Court: Tamil Nadu State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Chennai

Decided on: Apr-25-2011

..... changed the water pump motor again the complainant asked for replacement of the said machine but the opposite party informed the ..... of service the complainant started threatening the opposite party for replacement of the set the opposite party has not accepted to ..... clearly proved for non providing proper service for repair or replacing spares for the defective machine purchased by the complainant are .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 27 2011 (TRI)

Managing Director, M/S. K.K.J Group International (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs ...

Court: Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Thiruvananthapuram

Decided on: Aug-27-2011

..... opposite party oriental insurance company limited the insurer of the vehicle is not permitting to replace the defective chasis of the vehicle thus the complainant prayed for getting the vehicle repaired ..... he directed to repair the damaged vehicle the appellant complainant was of the view that replacement of the damaged chasis was required for making the vehicle roadworthy admittedly the insurer .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 14 2011 (TRI)

Sophy Thomas and Others Vs. Indus Motors Co. Pvt. Ltd. Represented by ...

Court: Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Thiruvananthapuram

Decided on: Jul-14-2011

..... vehicle repaired in perfect running condition without collecting costs of the replaced ecm and also to pay a sum of rs 10 000 ..... of the vehicle purposefully they wanted either to get the vehicle replaced or the price of the vehicle refunded with interest the vehicle ..... sanctioned by the insurance company the complainants are not entitled for replacement of the vehicle or for refund of the price of the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 30 2011 (TRI)

M/S Ideal Systems Pazhoor and Another Vs. T. Jacob Rasalam

Court: Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Thiruvananthapuram

Decided on: Jun-30-2011

..... on the part of the opposite parties in effecting the warranty replacement of the defective parts of the computer which was purchased ..... party m s ideal systems had given a warranty for replacement of defective components of the computer in d1 machine return ..... of their failure to comply with the warranty conditions of replacement of the defective components considering the cost of the defective .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 08 2011 (HC)

Great Eastern Appliances Pvt. Limited Vs. Santosh Kumar Kanodia at S.K ...

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Jul-08-2011

..... of time the original product was found defective and was replaced even the replaced product became non functional with a few months both ..... oven was a defective one and the same required a complete replacement 6 thereafter on 23rd october 2007 under a challan dated ..... only on one occasion an engineer of the petitioner examined the replaced microwave oven and confirmed that the said microwave oven has .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 23 2011 (TRI)

M/S Regal Marine Industries Inc., 2300, Jetport Drive, Orlando and Oth ...

Court: Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Thiruvananthapuram

Decided on: Jul-23-2011

..... made being not successful the 4th opposite party arranged for the replacement of the volvo engine with another volvo engine even subsequently on ..... per the operators manual on 27 3 07 the engine was replaced the new engine was imported from europe by air freight spending ..... same could not be provided as they have already given a replacement which is in absolutely good working condition the same is evident .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 15 2011 (TRI)

Tata Engineering Head Office, Customer Support Passenger Car, Business ...

Court: Tamil Nadu State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Chennai

Decided on: Mar-15-2011

..... 2002 cpj 137 in which it was held for minor defects complainant not entitled to replacement absence of acceptable proof for manufacturing defect complainant utilizing which complainant took delivery of vehicle ..... or refunds it is price merely because some defects identified which can be rectified or replaced absence of expert evidence in support of allegations deficiency in service not proved order .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Replacement - Judgment Search Results