Replacement - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: replacement Year: 1968 Page 1 of about 152 results (0.145 seconds)Puttarangamma and 2 ors. Vs. M.S. Ranganna and 3 ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Feb-08-1968
Reported in: AIR1968SC1018; 1972LabIC942; [1968]3SCR119
..... act 1922 in respect of the diesel oil engine fitted to the motor vehicles in replacement of the existing engines ii the definition of machinery given by the privy council in ..... within the meaning of the expression in cls vi and via per shah j dissenting replacement of a petrol engine by a new diesel engine in a motor car cannot be .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Chairman, Brooke Bond India Private Ltd. and anr. Vs. Chandranath ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-03-1968
Reported in: AIR1969SC992; [1969(19)FLR180]; (1969)IILLJ387SC; [1969]1SCR919
..... tenancy dismissing the appeal held per majority and bhagwati jj contra the present act which replaces the 1949 act adopts a completely new scheme of its own and provides for every .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe State of Rajasthan Vs. the Mewar Sugar Mills Ltd., Bhopalsagar
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Aug-26-1968
Reported in: AIR1969SC880; [1969]1SCR845; [1969]24STC174(SC); 1968()WLN13
..... act are required to be construed harmoniously the 1948 act has not been repealed or replaced by the 1998 act the state electricity board is a state within the meaning of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMohar Rai and Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Mar-22-1968
Reported in: AIR1968SC1281; 1969(17)BLJR35; 1968CriLJ1479; [1968]3SCR525
..... by arbitration clause cannot be objected to more so when it was only case of replacement of sole arbitrator who was earlier appointed and there was no objection to credibility of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState of Maharashtra Etc. Vs. Madhavrao Damodar Patilchand and ors. Et ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Apr-10-1968
Reported in: AIR1968SC1395; (1969)71BOMLR141; 1969MhLJ17(SC); [1968]3SCR712
..... in 1948 could continue uninterrupted even beyond 1950 and it did not lapse or get replaced by another act of state these rights in question cannot be protected under the constitution .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDevraj Urs Vs. Mysore State Road Transport Corporation (by General Man ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Oct-16-1968
Reported in: (1970)ILLJ549Kant
..... system was worn out if the assessee has provided certain amenities to its customers by replacing the old system with a better sound system it cannot be said that the assessee .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTIndian Pan Works, Delhi Vs. the Chief Commissioner, Delhi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-24-1968
Reported in: AIR1969Delhi1a; 4(1968)DLT568; [1969]24STC44a(Delhi)
..... during pendency of the proceedings delhi state was formed and lieutenant governor of delhi have replaced chief commissioner the court adjudged that the petitioner have shown lack of proper care and .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState of Punjab Vs. Satya Pal Dang and ors. and Baldev Parkash and ors ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jul-30-1968
Reported in: AIR1969SC903; [1969]1SCR478
..... act are required to be construed harmoniously the 1948 act has not been repealed or replaced by the 1998 act the state electricity board is a state within the meaning of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAutomobile Transport Rajasthan (P) Ltd., Ajmer Vs. the Regional Transp ...
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: May-01-1968
Reported in: AIR1968Raj334
..... learned judge further observed as follows when during the proceedings for replacement it came to the notice of the regional transport authority ..... judge therefore quashed the order of the regional transport authority allowing replacement on payment of rs 250 as compounding fee and the ..... to pay rs 250 as compounding fee when it prayed for replacement of its bus the learned single judge has pointed out .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRajput Tejsinh Pratapsingh Vs. the State of Gujarat
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Aug-18-1968
Reported in: (1969)10GLR106
..... learned judges constituting the majority was that what became final and replaced the order of the lower court was the judgment of ..... would therefore bo a judgment and such judgment when pronounced would replace the judgment of the lower court thus constituting the judgment ..... in the exercise of its appellate or revisional jurisdiction would replace the judgment of the lower court and there would be .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial