Replacement - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: replacement Year: 1980 Page 1 of about 202 results (0.012 seconds)Bhagwan and anr. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jul-30-1980
Reported in: AIR1980SC1750; 1980CriLJ1269; 1980Supp(1)SCC316
..... act 1922 in respect of the diesel oil engine fitted to the motor vehicles in replacement of the existing engines ii the definition of machinery given by the privy council in ..... within the meaning of the expression in cls vi and via per shah j dissenting replacement of a petrol engine by a new diesel engine in a motor car cannot be .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDayal Saran Sanan Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jan-16-1980
Reported in: AIR1980SC554; 1980LabIC380; (1980)3SCC25; 1980(12)LC509(SC)
..... tenancy dismissing the appeal held per majority and bhagwati jj contra the present act which replaces the 1949 act adopts a completely new scheme of its own and provides for every .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCol. Avtar Singh Sekhon Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jul-31-1980
Reported in: AIR1980SC2041; 1981(29)BLJR110; (1981)IILLJ405SC; 1980Supp(1)SCC562; [1981]1SCR168; 1981(13)LC180(SC)
..... tenancy dismissing the appeal held per majority and bhagwati jj contra the present act which replaces the 1949 act adopts a completely new scheme of its own and provides for every .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTC.C. Padmanabhan and ors. Vs. Director of Public Instructions and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jul-30-1980
Reported in: AIR1981SC64; 1980Supp(1)SCC668; [1981]1SCR128; 1980(12)LC833(SC); 19SCSR773
..... act are required to be construed harmoniously the 1948 act has not been repealed or replaced by the 1998 act the state electricity board is a state within the meaning of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCapt. Virendra Kumar Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Apr-22-1980
Reported in: AIR1981SC947; 1981LabIC433; (1981)1SCC485; 1980(12)LC701(SC)
..... act are required to be construed harmoniously the 1948 act has not been repealed or replaced by the 1998 act the state electricity board is a state within the meaning of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTOfficial Liquidator of High Court of Karnataka Vs. Smt. V. Lakshmikutt ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Dec-12-1980
Reported in: AIR1981SC1483; [1981]51CompCas566(SC); (1981)3SCC32; [1981]2SCR349; 1981(13)LC495(SC)
..... by arbitration clause cannot be objected to more so when it was only case of replacement of sole arbitrator who was earlier appointed and there was no objection to credibility of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRaja Dharampal Singh Vs. Director, Small Industries Services Institute ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Feb-26-1980
Reported in: AIR1980SC1888; 1980Supp(1)SCC505
..... in 1948 could continue uninterrupted even beyond 1950 and it did not lapse or get replaced by another act of state these rights in question cannot be protected under the constitution .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAshok Prapan Sharma Vs. the State of Uttar Pradesh and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Nov-14-1980
Reported in: AIR1981All101
..... ancient monuments preservation act 1904 two ancient statutes from premises of temple ordered to be replaced by district magistrate validity of order questioned held district magistrate had no jurisdiction to authorize .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAndrus Vs. Utah
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-19-1980
..... from the early 1800 s evidences congress consistent respect for the federal obligation to replace unavailable school sections with indemnity lands of equal acreage see united states v morrison ..... of 1874 underwent extensive revision in 1891 the resulting law appropriated additional land to replace school sections lost because they were mineral in character included within a federal reservation .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDawson Chem. Co. Vs. Rohm and Haas Co.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-27-1980
..... of infringing combinations from liability defeated liability for contributory infringement with respect to replacement of convertible tops after the agreement went into effect the plurality rejected the ..... the staple nonstaple distinction which aro i found irrelevant to the characterization of replacements supplies the controlling benchmark this distinction ensures that the patentee s right to .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial