Rendering - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: rendering Year: 2002 Page 1 of about 585 results (0.059 seconds)South Eastern Coalfields Ltd. Vs. Jt. Cit
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Nagpur
Decided on: Feb-28-2002
Reported in: (2002)77TTJ(Nag.)401
..... there was merely a significant change in the material and relevant facts concerning the issue rendering the earlier decision given by the learned commissioner appeals in assessment year 1991 92 inapplicable ..... that the decision of tribunal in assessees own case for assessment year 1988 89 was rendered in entirely different facts and circumstances and therefore the issue involved in the present appeal .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSouth Eastern Coalfields Ltd. Vs. Joint Commissioner of Income Tax
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Nagpur
Decided on: Feb-28-2002
Reported in: (2003)260ITR1(Nag.)
..... change in the material and relevant facts concerning the issue rendering the earlier decision given by the learned cit a in ..... the performance of the formalities prescribed by a statute has been rendered impossible by circumstances over which the persons interested had no ..... examining these decisions we find the first decision which is rendered by the bombay high court considered a case prior to .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHewlett Packard India Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi
Decided on: Nov-29-2002
Reported in: (2003)80TTJ(Delhi)208
..... to the business of the assessee 8 the next decision cited before us has been rendered by supreme court in the case of cit v coal shipments p ltd supra in ..... nature of the expenditure one must avoid being caught in the maze of judicial decisions rendered on different facts and which always present distinguishing features for a comparison with the facts .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDeputy Commissioner of Vs. Metro Shoes P. Ltd.
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
Decided on: Aug-09-2002
Reported in: (2002)258ITR106(Mum.)
1 this appeal has been filed by the department against the order dated august 4 1994 of the learned commissioner...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDeputy Cit Vs. Metro Shoes (P) Ltd.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Aug-09-2002
Reported in: (2004)89TTJ(Mumbai)48
ordera k ja in j m this appeal has been filed by the department against the order dated 4th aug...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSebi Vs. Rayban Sun Optics India Ltd.
Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT
Decided on: Aug-05-2002
..... have already acquired shares then the provisions regarding public announcement in sebi regulations would be rendered nugatory the salutary protections contemplated through public announcement would be lost in view of ..... of shares and then only a person can acquire shares any other interpretation would render public announcement superfluous and the objectives sought to be achieved would be lost this .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSebi Vs. Clariant International Ltd.
Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT
Decided on: Oct-16-2002
..... shares control and then only a person can acquire shares control any other interpretation would render public announcement superfluous and the objectives sought to be achieved would be lost this is .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTShaw Wallace and Co. Ltd. Vs. Asstt. Cit
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Kolkata
Decided on: Feb-25-2002
Reported in: (2003)86ITD315(Kol.)
..... the very person concern giving such loan does not arise as there is no service rendered so as to merit any separate payment according to him the real purpose of the ..... before the commissioner appeals the assessee submitted that the payment was made for the services rendered in connection with organising and arranging finance to the extent of rs 11 5 crores .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJewel of India Vs. Assistant Commissioner of
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
Decided on: Sep-16-2002
Reported in: (2003)87ITD527(Mum.)
1 this appeal of the assessee is directed against the order of the cit 18 mumbai which he passed under...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTParesh M. Parekh, Yogesh B. Vs. the Chairman, Securities and
Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT
Decided on: Oct-08-2002
1 these four appeals are directed against the respondent s four orders all dated 19 2 2002 by the said...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial