Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Rendering - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 08 2012

The Judgment Rendered in Gemini Vs. State of Maharashtra [(2004) 9 Scc

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Feb-08-2012

issue which culminated in the judgment reported at 114 Comp Cas 92 (In re: Gemini Silk Ltd) being rendered. The judgment held that an order sanctioning a scheme would amount to an instrument and conveyance that would


Jan 13 2014

Rendered by the Appellant Was Short and Intermittent from September 1 ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Jan-13-2014

demanding retrenchment compensation and the compensation so paid is not only a reward earned for his previous services rendered to the employer but is also a sustenance to the worker for the period which may be spent


Jan 08 1908

Consolidated Rendering Co. Vs. Vermont

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-08-1908

Consolidated Rendering Co. v. Vermont - 207 U.S. 541 (1908) U.S. Supreme Court Consolidated Rendering Co. v. Vermont, 207 U.S.


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 17 2023

M/S. Freshcut Organic Products (P) Ltd vs M/S. C.M. Rendering Plant

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Nov-17-2023

ADVS.ENOCH DAVID SIMON JOEL S.SREEDEV RONY JOSE LEO LUKOSE CIMIL CHERIAN KOTTALIL RESPONDENTS/WRIT PETITIONER & RESPONDENTS:1 M/S. C.M. RENDERING PLANT, PULPATTA, PULPATTA P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN-676 123 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, ABDULLA P.C., AGED 51 YEARS,


Jul 01 2014

“by Placing Reliance Upon a Judgment Rendered by This Court in B.S.N ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Jul-01-2014

date demand notice was issued by respondent-workman on 4.7.2007. It is an admitted fact that respondent No.1 had rendered service for a period of 1½ year. There is nothing on record to show that his service was


  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial