Rendering - Judgment Search Results

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. I.C.i. (India) Pvt. Ltd.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: [1983]139ITR105(Cal)

deb j 1 the following question is involved in this reference under section 66 1 of the indian i t...

Panyam Cements and Mineral Industries Ltd. Vs. Addl. Commissioner of I ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: [1979]117ITR770(AP)

amareswari j 1 in this case the following three questions of law have been referred by the income tax appellate...

Shaffer Vs. Heitner

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the purpose and length of time for which sequestered property is held the court concluded rendered inapplicable the due process requirements enunciated in sniadach v family finance corp 395 u s ..... court that because of other circumstances there is a reasonable possibility that such release may render it substantially less likely that plaintiff will obtain satisfaction of any judgment secured if such .....

United States Vs. Ramsey

Court: US Supreme Court

united states v ramsey 431 u s 606 1977 u s supreme court united states v ramsey 431 u s...

Avtar Singh and ors. Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: 1978CriLJ324

j p chaturvedi j 1 these are three criminal appeals criminal appeal no 398 of 1977 is by avtar singh...

State of Rajasthan and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1977SC1361; (1977)3SCC592; [1978]1SCR1

..... of parliament when he is satisfied that circumstances exist which render it necessary for him to take immediate action and clause ..... promulgating ordinances when he is satisfied that circumstances exist which render it necessary for him to take immediate action this contention ..... of parliament when he is satisfied that circumstances exist which render it necessary for him to take immediate action and .....

M. George and ors. Vs. Raju M. Mathew

Court: Kerala

Reported in: AIR1978Ker17

order1 this revision petition is against the order of the sub court pathanamthitta in arbitration o p no 1 of...

Arvind Mills Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Gujarat-ii

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: [1978]112ITR64(Guj)

..... itself for the said purpose is a matter of no consequence and it does not render the expenditure incurred by the assessee on that account any the less capital outlay if .....

United States Vs. Larinoff

Court: US Supreme Court

..... speculative events and the sort of uncertainty the contested regulations inject into the program which rendered the primary determinant of the vrb entirely unpredictable at the time the decision to extend .....

GiasuddIn and ors. Vs. the State of Assam

Court: Guwahati

s rangarajan j 1 the twelve appellants have been convicted under sections 148 302 read with 149 i p c...