Removable - Judgment Search Results
Pacific Railroad Removal Cases
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-04-1885
facts for the purpose of showing that the cause was removable, averring its acceptance of the acts of Congress and the
Removal Cases
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-01-1879
have given this provision of the statute, the suit was removable by reason of that provision. This makes it unnecessary to
Sarva Shramik Sanghatana Vs. M/S. Interim International Removals Divis ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jul-01-2016
of 2015) SARVA SHRAMIK SANGHATANA APPELLANT VERSUS M/S. INTERIM INTERNATIONAL REMOVALS DIVISION OF FREIGHT SYSTEMS (INDIA) PVT. LTD. RESPONDENT JUDGMENT KURIAN,J.1.
Turn these results into brief-ready notes
Girish Chandra Singh Son of Late Kanhaiya Singh Sub-inspector (Grp) (R ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Dec-03-2007
Reported in: 2008(1)AWC906; [2008(116)FLR599]
of this writ petition has challenged the order of his removal from service dated 24.8.2005 and the appellate order dated 5.4.2006
State of A.P. Rep. by Its Principal Secretary, Agriculture and Co-op. ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-22-2010
Reported in: 2010(3)ALT17
appointment orders, it is not open for the petitioners to remove the applicant from service for no fault of him.6. Admittedly,
Randhir Singh, Sarpanch (Removed), Gram Panchayat Vs. State of Haryana ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Dec-18-1997
Reported in: (1998)118PLR450
Gupta, J.1. The petitioner a Sarpanch-complains that he was arbitrarily removed from his office Under Section 51(3) of the Haryana Panchayati
Chinnathorai Pillai Vs. Rao Bahadur M.R. Govinda Rao (Since Removed fr ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-04-1927
Reported in: (1927)53MLJ306
1. The plaintiff-respondent is the manager of the Piranmalai Devasthanam. He instituted a suit to recover rent in respect of...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
Try AI Brief & Semantic Search — 7 days free