Relevant - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: relevant Year: 1984 Page 1 of about 355 results (0.118 seconds)Dr Y.P. Gupta Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-24-1984
Reported in: 1984LabIC1712; 1984(2)SCALE543; (1985)1SCC43; 1985(17)LC235(SC)
..... given the higher scale necessary consequence of being put in the higher scale from the relevant date dr y p gupta for all purposes would be senior to dr s l .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCheekati Parasuram Naidu Vs. Mariserla Venkatarami Naidu and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-26-1984
Reported in: AIR1985AP169
..... and besides that special instructions that were issued instruction 23 relevant for our purpose is in the following terms a substitute ..... and failed to examine him however the government pleader produced the relevant file wherein the communication of the board dated 26 9 ..... the execution of any works undertaken by that government the relevant part of objects and reasons for this amendment states it .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNat'l Farmers Union Ins. Vs. Crow Tribe
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Sep-10-1984
nat l farmers union ins v crow tribe 468 u s 1315 1984 u s supreme court nat l farmers...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTStraw Products Ltd. Vs. Assistant Collector of Central Excise and ors.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-29-1984
Reported in: 1985(6)ECC35; 1984(17)ELT224(MP)
orderc p sen j 1 this is a petition under article 226 of the constitution challenging the order of the...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTEscondido Water Co. Vs. La Jolla Indians
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-15-1984
..... under their respective supervision were adequately protected in a memorandum explaining the administration bill the relevant portion of which was enacted without substantive change footnote 15 o c merrill one of ..... the bands before they operate licensed facilities located on reservation lands section 8 provides in relevant part subsequent to the issuance of any tribal patent footnote 27 or of any .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSivan Pillai Vs. B.C. Jose
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Dec-17-1984
Reported in: AIR1986Ker153
..... by all the candidates who were entitled to if it was a relevant fact as stated earlier in law the candidates who have secured ..... whether the contention is sustainable or not in the light of the relevant provisions of the act section 34 of the act provides thus ..... 1982 section 62 of the representation of the people act fixes the relevant date to be reckoned for the purpose of determining the electors who .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMange Ram Vs. Brij Mohan and ors.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-30-1984
Reported in: AIR1985P& H6
..... for this when respondent 1 appeared as witness he was questioned on the subject the relevant record reads as under q is it a fact that when dewan singh p w ..... doubt true that the affidavit sworn by the petitioner indicates that he had received the relevant information from dewan singh p w 16 but the petitions are sometimes drafted in a .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTLynch Vs. Donnelly
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Mar-05-1984
..... religion it is only practices having that effect whether intentionally or unintentionally that make religion relevant in reality or public perception to status in the political community pawtucket s display of ..... the views expressed by the california supreme court in considering a similar issue are particularly relevant when a city so openly promotes the religious meaning of one religion s holidays .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHoover Vs. Ronwin
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-14-1984
..... in the arizona supreme court rules this case arises under totally different circumstances although the relevant legal principles are the same the dissent s reliance on goldfarb simply misreads the ..... no doubt will prove formidable footnote 2 24 moreover petitioners motives will not necessarily be relevant to respondent s case if the proof demonstrates that petitioners have adopted a reasonable .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBlossom Compania Naviera S.A. and Vs. Collector of Customs
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Sep-17-1984
Reported in: (1985)LC379Tri(Mum.)bai
1 the appeal 219 80 arises out of the order in appeal bearing nos 377a 378a of 1979 dated 19...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial