Relevant - Judgment Search Results

Parvathi Amma Vs. Makki Amma

Court: Kerala

Reported in: AIR1962Ker85

madhavan nair j 1 these appeals have been referred to a full bench because of a common question arising in...

Nekumar K. Porwal Vs. Mohanlal Hargovindas

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: AIR1963Bom246; (1962)64BOMLR616

order1 this is a petition by way of an appeal against the order passed by the deputy registrar of trade...

Power Reactor Development Co. Vs. Electricians

Court: US Supreme Court

..... a finding of safety vel non it considered the site along with all the other relevant data there is no warrant in the statute for setting aside the commission s conclusion ..... 367 u s 396app appendix to opinion of mr justice douglas section 182a provides in relevant part license applications a each application for a license hereunder shall be in writing and .....

Roper Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

roper v united states 368 u s 20 1961 u s supreme court roper v united states 368 u s...

Campbell Vs. Hussey

Court: US Supreme Court

..... state measures it treated coincidence as only one factor in the complicated pattern of facts relevant to the question of preemption pointing out in the words of mr justice holmes that .....

System Federation Vs. Wright

Court: US Supreme Court

..... injunction and damages against the railroad and a number of unions representing its employees particularly relevant to the complaint were those provisions of the fourth and fifth paragraphs of 2 of ..... 152 eleventh see railway employees department v hanson 351 u s 225 footnote 4 the relevant provisions of rule 60 b are as follows on motion and upon such terms as .....

Lathrop Vs. Donohue

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the legislature however this fact was not determinative but was merely relevant to the character of the state s action the absence ..... to any of these inquiries as to facts which may be relevant to the determination of constitutional questions surrounding the political expenditures ..... be embezzlers footnote 4 2 the present objection might not be relevant in that case one risk of the profession would be .....

Pan American Petroleum Corp. Vs. Superior Court

Court: US Supreme Court

..... on the contractually determined prices the letter of january 21 1954 the voucher checks other relevant correspondence and this court s reversal of the kansas supreme court s decision upholding the .....

Eli Lilly and Co. Vs. Sav-on-drugs, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

eli lilly co v sav on drugs inc 366 u s 276 1961 u s supreme court eli lilly co...

Mohamed Isak Saheb and ors. Vs. NajaruddIn Shamansaheb Mulla and ors.

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: AIR1962Kant253; AIR1962Mys253

..... of the possession was not granted by the assistant collector of the relevant revenue sub division under his order dated 1 8 1921 wherein he ..... section 5 of the said act but by the terms of the relevant sanad according to which they are inalienable when therefore a mulla purports ..... section 5 of the said act but by the terms of the relevant sanad according to which they are inalienable and even if the .....