Relevant - Judgment Search Results

Dilbagh Rai Jarry Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1974SC130; [1973(27)FLR428]; 1974LabIC149; (1974)ILLJ164SC; (1974)3SCC554; [1974]2SCR178; 1974(6)LC1(SC); (1973)3SCC554

sarkaria j 1 this appeal by special leave is directed against the order dated november 4 1965 of the high...

The Republican Party of India Vs. the Election Commission of India

Court: Delhi

Reported in: ILR1974Delhi509

v s deshpande j 1 though the process of election to parliament and the state legislatures is a sine qua...

Almota Farmers Elev. and Whse. Co. Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

almota farmers elev whse co v united states 409 u s 470 1973 u s supreme court almota farmers elev...

Ganesh Panigrahi Vs. Jura Sahu and ors.

Court: Orissa

Reported in: AIR1973Ori232; 39(1973)CLT243

..... i am satisfied that the above mentioned findings of fact are borne out by the relevant evidence on record and are perfectly correct and justified and there is absolutely no reason ..... i am satisfied that the above mentioned findings of fact are borne out by the relevant evidence on record and are perfectly correct and justified and there is absolutely no reason .....

City of Burbank Vs. Lockheed Air Terminal, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... prescribing and amending standards and regulations under this section the faa shall 1 consider relevant available data relating to aircraft noise and sonic boom including the results of research ..... and amending standards rules and regulations under this section the administrator shall 1 consider relevant available data relating to aircraft noise and sonic boom including the results of research .....

State of Mysore Vs. R.V. Bidap

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1973SC2555; 1974LabIC251; (1973)IILLJ418SC; (1974)3SCC337; [1974]1SCR589

..... paramount purpose and the expressed language of the provisions and the slight obscurity of the relevant articles the expert drafting and careful screening by the founding fathers notwithstanding 2 one shri ..... of a statute being an exercise in the ascertainment of meaning everything which is logically relevant should be admissible recently an eminent indian jurist has reviewed the legal position and .....

Kesavananda Bharati Sripadagalvaru and ors.Vs. State of Kerala and anr ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1973SC1461; (1973)4SCC225; [1973]SuppSCR1

..... lebanon vietnam democratic republic belgium costa rica cuba and nicaragua i have examined the relevant provisions of these constitutions regarding the amendatory process these constitutions have used different ..... the equivalent in terms of money of the property compulsorily acquired according to relevant principles which principles must be appropriate to the determination of compensation for the .....

Atchison, T. and S.F. R. Co. Vs. Wichita Bd. of Trade

Court: US Supreme Court

..... 7 do not specifically govern this situation nor is there any other provision in the relevant statutes depriving federal courts of their general equitable power to preserve the status quo to ..... the error might be considered purely procedural for example where the commission failed to consider relevant evidence on grounds the reviewing court finds inadequate the issuance of an injunction might not .....

Broadrick Vs. Oklahoma

Court: US Supreme Court

..... even if the outermost boundaries of 818 may be imprecise any such uncertainty has little relevance here where appellants conduct falls squarely within the hard core of the statute s proscriptions ..... hearing and submit a transcript thereof together with a recommendation to the state personnel board relevant witnesses shall be allowed to be present and testify at such hearings if the officer .....

ChaffIn Vs. Stynchcombe

Court: US Supreme Court

..... problems surrounding the imposition of difficult choices in the criminal process and is of particular relevance since it arises in the context of jury sentencing petitioner crampton attacked the ohio system ..... ordinarily the resentencing jury would not be informed of any conduct of the accused unless relevant to the question of guilt see note supra n 8 at 978 980 stubbs supra .....