Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Relax - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial to open GPT-powered briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results — plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 09 2007

Relax Safety Industries, Mumbai and anr. Vs. the Commissioner of Custo ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: May-09-2007

Reported in: 2007(212)ELT289(SC); JT2007(7)SC17; 2007(7)SCALE43; (2007)5SCC759; 2007(2)LC934(SC)

Arijit Pasayat, J.1. Challenge in these appeals is to the judgment of the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal,...


Apr 23 2002

Relax Safety Industries Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Apr-23-2002

Reported in: (2002)(144)ELT652Tri(Mum.)bai

Section 112 of the Act on Jayant Maru, Proprietor of Relax Safety Industries (appeal 1807/94) and Himant Tank (Appeal 1776/94).2. Relax


Nov 07 2005

Relax Safety Industries Vs. Director of Enforcement

Court: Appellate Tribunal for foreign Exchange New Delhi

Decided on: Nov-07-2005

imposing a penalty of Rs. 20 lakhs against appellant M/s Relax Safety Industries, a partnership firm, in appeal No. 214/2005 and


Turn these results into brief-ready notes

Jul 17 2017

Nocil Ltd. Vs.the Policy Relaxation Committee & Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jul-17-2017

Jitesh P. Gupta, Mr. Ashutosh Mishra, Advocates. versus THE POLICY RELAXATION COMMITTEE & ORS. ......... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Abhishek Ghai Advocates


Sep 17 2009

L. Sathy Vs. Circle Relaxation Committee Rep. by the Senior Superinten ...

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam

Decided on: Sep-17-2009

The respondents have rejected the claim stating that the Circle Relaxation Committee has not recommended the case. Representation before the Chief


  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

Try AI Brief & Semantic Search — 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial