Rejectment - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: rejectment Year: 1992 Page 1 of about 3,228 results (0.035 seconds)Darshan Lal Mehra and Others Vs. Union of India and Others
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Aug-04-1992
Reported in: AIR1992SC1848; JT1992(4)SC417; 1992(2)SCALE113; (1992)4SCC28; [1992]3SCR704; [1992]87STC377(SC); 1992(2)LC461(SC); (1992)2UPLBEC1162
..... objections section201 of the act empowers the state government to reject modify or to accept the proposed rules under section ..... municipal corporation of the city of poona air1959sc586 we therefore reject the contention raised by the learned counsel for the petitioners ..... purports to be regulating and that alternative is to be rejected which will introduce uncertainty friction or confusion into the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTShripad Vasudeo Vatve and anr. Vs. Narhar Bhargav Karmarkar
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jan-08-1992
Reported in: 1992(2)BomCR630; (1992)94BOMLR84
a v savant j 1 this is a petition by the original plaintiffs landlords arising out of proceedings initiated by...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTishwar Dass Rajput Vs. Chaman Parkash Puri and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-11-1992
Reported in: 46(1992)DLT619; 1992(22)DRJ168
..... obtained one after another till 5th february 1976 when the application under section 21 was rejected by the addl rent controller but the petitioner continued to be tenant under shri ramji .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAnant B. Timbodia Vs. Union of India and Others
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Feb-26-1992
Reported in: AIR1992SC1272; 1992(38)ECC175; 1992LC161(SC); 1993(63)ELT401(SC); JT1992(2)SC59; 1992(1)SCALE527; 1992Supp(2)SCC145; [1992]1SCR997; 1992(1)LC583(SC)
ordern m kasliwal j 1 special leave granted 2 this appeal has been filed against the judgment of the bombay...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState of Maharashtra Vs. Prakash and Another
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Mar-24-1992
Reported in: AIR1992SC1275; 1992CriLJ1924; 1993(1)SCALE721; 1993Supp(1)SCC653
order1 this appeal is preferred by the state of maharashtra against the judgment of a learned single judge of the...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBangalore Wire Rod Mills Vs. Union of India
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Apr-10-1992
Reported in: 1992(61)ELT37(Kar); ILR1992KAR1609
..... endorsement dated 8 2 1989 annexure a 41 to the petitioner rejecting its request for waiving the interest the endorsement reads annexure ..... of its view in that view of the matter while rejecting the application made by the petitioner invoking the proviso to ..... issue demand notice in terms of section 59 the respondents neither rejected the application for extending the period of bonding nor issued .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe State of Karnataka Vs. Mohammed Sharif
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-21-1992
Reported in: 1993CriLJ747; 1992(4)KarLJ237
order1 this criminal revision petition is filed under sections 401 397 and 482 cr p c by the state against...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM.J. Exports Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Joint Chief Controller of Imports ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-13-1992
Reported in: 1992(40)ECC446
..... from proceeding further in c c no 72 85 3 the learned singled judge has rejected the writ petition on the ground that the offences punishable under the various central enactments ..... not mentioning about said relative is an afterthought and cannot be believed prayer for transfer rejected it may also be pointed out that the creation of the special court under the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDistrict Bhatinda Khadi Gram Udyog Karya Karta Sangh Vs. Amarjit Pal a ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jan-06-1992
Reported in: (1992)101PLR575
v k jhanji j 1 this civil revision is directed against the order of learned appellate authority upsetting the order...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBhagwati Prasad Vs. Rameshchand and ors.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-13-1992
Reported in: 1994(0)MPLJ619
..... on behalf of the plaintiff landlords alleging that the amendment proposed was liable to be rejected as being highly belated actuated by mala fides and attempting at dislodging the plaintiff landlords ..... actuated by mala fides such an amendment cannot be allowed la no 3 is therefore rejected 10 moreover the sin which the tenant appellant has committed would not be wiped out .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial