Rejectment - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: rejectment Year: 1968 Page 1 of about 1,209 results (0.05 seconds)Lalta and ors. Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Oct-25-1968
Reported in: AIR1970SC1381; 1970CriLJ1270; [1969]2SCR526
..... become purchasers on that date though if the application were rejected later they could become pur chasers on such postponed date ..... his application under s 31 and such withdrawal amounted to rejection in law the appellants could not claim the benefit of ..... and without jurisdiction me collector could pass the earlier orders rejecting the applications for revision in october 1958 on the materials .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKedarnath Gangagopal Misra Vs. Sitaram Narayan Moharil
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Feb-02-1968
Reported in: AIR1969Bom221; (1968)70BOMLR788; ILR1969Bom324; 1968MhLJ762
..... the bailiff and another witness arvind khandekar the defence of the judgment debtor has been rejected when the papers reached the appellate court learned district court heard the counsel on both .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJ.P. Jani, Income-tax Officer, Circle Iv, Ward G, Ahmedabad and anr. V ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Aug-20-1968
Reported in: AIR1969SC778; [1969]72ITR595(SC); [1969]1SCR714
ramaswami j 1 this appeal is brought by certificate against the judgment of the gujarat high court dated 14 15th...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTS.T. Venkataiah Thimmaiah and anr. Vs. State of Mysore and ors.
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-26-1968
Reported in: ILR1968KAR835; (1968)2MysLJ491
chandrashekhar j 1 in these petitions under art 226 of the constitution the petitioners have challenged the validity of the...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTT.S. Baliah Vs. T.S. Rengachari
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Dec-12-1968
Reported in: AIR1969SC701; [1969]72ITR787(SC); [1969]3SCR65
..... of this case and that the argument of the appellant on this point must be rejected 7 we pass on to consider the next question argued on behalf of the appellant ..... but shall not be liable to be punished twice for the same offence we accordingly reject the argument of the appellant on this aspect of the case 11 it was then .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income-tax, West Bengal Vs. Durga Prasad More
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Aug-22-1968
Reported in: [1969]72ITR807(SC)
..... of account constituted income from some undisclosed sources 2 whether the tribunal was entitled to reject the evidence on behalf of the assessee on mere scepticism instead of any tangible evidence ..... that profit was from undisclosed source no evidence of amount remitted and tribunal entitled to reject evidence on mere skepticism appeal to supreme court discharged high court answer p b gajendragadkar .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNani Gopal Mitra Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Oct-15-1968
Reported in: AIR1970SC1636; 1970(0)BLJR619; 1970CriLJ1396; [1969]2SCR411
..... even though it was repealed on december 18 1964 by the amending act we accordingly reject the argument of the appellant on this aspect of the case 10 it was next ..... no particulars of the persons from whom the bribes were taken were mentioned we accordingly reject the argument of the appellant on this point 14 for the reasons expressed we hold .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSyed Ibrahim and ors. Vs. Jalma and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-19-1968
Reported in: (1968)2MLJ83
m m ismail j 1 the appellants in the above second appeal and the civil miscellaneous appeal and the petitioners...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSurajmull Ghanshyamdas Vs. Samadarshan Sur
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: May-09-1968
Reported in: AIR1969Cal109
..... as good service the service by registered post in the instant case must therefore be rejected 11 as regards personal service this has been sought to be proved by an employee .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKuppa Bai Vs. A. Rajagopal Nadar and anr.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Dec-20-1968
Reported in: (1969)2MLJ541
..... declaration that the lessor was not entitled to impose the condition cozens hardy m r rejecting the lessee s claim said restrospective operation is an inaccurate term almost every statute affects ..... finding against the appellant on the relevant provisions of the repealed statutes the judicial committee rejected the contention that the power to take advantage of an enactment is a right accrued .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial